So, was it a lab leak or nah?

Where all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply

Did the COVID pandemic begin because of a lab leak from the WIV?

Yes
17
81%
No
4
19%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 9194
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#101

Post by Charliesheen »

That’s the conundrum. We all know the left is dying to hang this around Trump’s neck.

But to hang anything would imply that something actually exists. The crickets make total sense.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29399
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#102

Post by Animal »

Charliesheen wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:55 pm That’s the conundrum. We all know the left is dying to hang this around Trump’s neck.

But to hang anything would imply that something actually exists. The crickets make total sense.
i think they think its a Tarp.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#103

Post by Biker »

Link to the email dump if you’re interested. Why he was in contact with Bill Gates early and often is bizarre

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/na ... d-response
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12854
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#104

Post by Stapes »

Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm Sars came from an animal source

Mers came from an animal source

Both corona viruses.

It is still more plausible so did covid-19

But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?

Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".

Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?


https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
I blame Biker.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#105

Post by Biker »

Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm Sars came from an animal source

Mers came from an animal source

Both corona viruses.

It is still more plausible so did covid-19

But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?

Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".

Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?


https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12854
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#106

Post by Stapes »

I blame Biker.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12854
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#107

Post by Stapes »

Biker wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm Sars came from an animal source

Mers came from an animal source

Both corona viruses.

It is still more plausible so did covid-19

But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?

Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".

Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?


https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.

You're like the UJR Tucker Carlson, half truths, outright lies, propaganda, pure bull shit misinformation. No credibility
I blame Biker.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29399
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#108

Post by Animal »

do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#109

Post by Biker »

Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
Biker wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm

actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?

Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".

Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?


https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.

You're like the UJR Tucker Carlson, half truths, outright lies, propaganda, pure bull shit misinformation. No credibility
I literally posted the emails, you ignorant fuck.

But seriously, is this the hill youre willing to die on, defending Fauci lies? Why are you so invested in that narrative now that Trump is gone? Its like you dont want to know the truth about how this started
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#110

Post by Biker »

Image
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12854
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#111

Post by Stapes »

Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:23 pm
do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.


You didn't read the article obviously. Basically there is no hard proof either way. What do you think public inquiry emails prove? There isn't any evidence given in these emails..... Just speculations..... Certainly no links to fauci or some biker cover uptin foil theory
I blame Biker.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#112

Post by Biker »

User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29399
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#113

Post by Animal »

Stapes wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:28 pm
Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:23 pm
do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.


You didn't read the article obviously. Basically there is no hard proof either way. What do you think public inquiry emails prove? There isn't any evidence given in these emails..... Just speculations..... Certainly no links to fauci or some biker cover uptin foil theory
i think it proves that Dr Fauci got an email from someone in March of 2020 with a heading on it called "Coronavirus Bio Weapon". Now, instead of all the bullshit, what do you make of that? Is it interesting that he knew about a Covid Bio Weapon?
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#114

Post by Biker »

58% of Americans believe COVID-19 started in a Chinese lab, according to a poll taken during the month of May by YouGov. That’s up from just 49% when YouGov first asked the question in May 2020.

Only 43% of Democrats believe in the lab-leak theory, compared to 77% of Republicans. Independents lean more toward the GOP view, with 65% now believing the virus came from a lab.

Just 24% of Americans believe it was released from a lab on purpose, while 30% believe it was released by accident. Only 13% say the virus developed completely naturally in the wild, and one-third of respondents said they did not know the answer.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#115

Post by Biker »

Image
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29399
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#116

Post by Animal »

well, if 58% of americans think it started in a lab, then that's almost 100%. Because there have to be at least 42% of americans that wouldn't even understand the question.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#117

Post by Biker »

Image
spudoc
Most Likely To Have a Neckbeard
Posts: 1363
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:31 am

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#118

Post by spudoc »

Animal wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:01 pm well, if 58% of americans think it started in a lab, then that's almost 100%. Because there have to be at least 42% of americans that wouldn't even understand the question.
Texas does not make up 42% of the population.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#119

Post by Biker »

Image
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#120

Post by Biker »

Image
User avatar
Cassandros
Hamsterphile
Posts: 2024
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#121

Post by Cassandros »

Biker wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:01 pm Image
This is interesting to me as I stumbled on this article just yesterday.
As COVID-19 collides with HIV/AIDS, the pandemic may be taking an ominous turn

As the world’s less affluent countries scramble for COVID-19 vaccine and contend with deadly surges of the disease, researchers in South Africa have just documented an ominous development: the collision of the pandemic with HIV/AIDS.
***

Still, the coronavirus that lingered in her body underwent 13 genetic changes related to its crucial spike protein, along with at least 19 other genetic shifts elsewhere that could change the behavior of the virus.
***

More than 30 genetic changes were detected in the patient's viral samples over the next 27 weeks, including a handful known to strengthen the virus’ ability to resist the vaccines and drugs that prevent or treat COVID-19.

Were they to begin circulating widely, they might have become the stuff of public health nightmares: “escape variants” capable of prolonging the pandemic.

It’s not yet clear whether any of the mutations she harbored spread to other people. But the researchers said it's probably not a coincidence that dangerous new variants have emerged from populations like those in South Africa's KwaZulu Natal province, where more than 1 in 4 adults has HIV.

https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-collide ... 51925.html
Hopefully she remains an outlier in these regards, and not a warning of whats to come.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
Antknot
Not Nearly As Old As Who
Posts: 7565
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#122

Post by Antknot »

Cassandros wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:33 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:01 pm Image
This is interesting to me as I stumbled on this article just yesterday.
As COVID-19 collides with HIV/AIDS, the pandemic may be taking an ominous turn

As the world’s less affluent countries scramble for COVID-19 vaccine and contend with deadly surges of the disease, researchers in South Africa have just documented an ominous development: the collision of the pandemic with HIV/AIDS.
***

Still, the coronavirus that lingered in her body underwent 13 genetic changes related to its crucial spike protein, along with at least 19 other genetic shifts elsewhere that could change the behavior of the virus.
***

More than 30 genetic changes were detected in the patient's viral samples over the next 27 weeks, including a handful known to strengthen the virus’ ability to resist the vaccines and drugs that prevent or treat COVID-19.

Were they to begin circulating widely, they might have become the stuff of public health nightmares: “escape variants” capable of prolonging the pandemic.

It’s not yet clear whether any of the mutations she harbored spread to other people. But the researchers said it's probably not a coincidence that dangerous new variants have emerged from populations like those in South Africa's KwaZulu Natal province, where more than 1 in 4 adults has HIV.

https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-collide ... 51925.html
Hopefully she remains an outlier in these regards, and not a warning of whats to come.
Since Covid I found in shit, those at risk for Analy Inserted Death Sentence seem to be at a higher risk.
User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 9194
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#123

Post by Charliesheen »

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30021700/

Holy shit. Those folks are fucked up.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#124

Post by Biker »

Charliesheen wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 3:04 pm https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30021700/

Holy shit. Those folks are fucked up.
44% of those women had HIV. Damn
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 14089
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?

#125

Post by Biker »

Image

Fauci was told it was an engineered virus? That’s all I can think of
Post Reply