UJRefugees.net

I don't know who's dumber, this dude or the fishing laws.

ThirdRail wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:35 am

Hank Hill must be so embarrassed about Bobby.

And will probably serve longer than Manafort.

HighNDry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm I don't know who's dumber, this dude or the fishing laws.

The idea is that the middle length fish are the most active breeding pairs. Take too many of them, you won't have the smaller or the larger fish.

Sometimes the rules and regulations do really make sense, even if they work against your own selfish interests.

HighNDry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm I don't know who's dumber, this dude or the fishing laws.

Stringent fishing laws are necessary because certain geniuses think fish are an unlimited resource. Yknow, like oil. You can't see the bottom of the barrel therefore there isn't one.

HighNDry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm I don't know who's dumber, this dude or the fishing laws.

well, at least when fishing if you catch one that you can't keep, you can toss it back in the lake. deer hunting you can't kill a buck with an inside spread (measurement between the widest part of the antlers) of 13 inches or less.

Try explaining to someone how to measure 13 inches from 150 yards away. And good luck bringing one back to life to release it if you find out its 1/4 inch too narrow.

Oh......

and Rack the thread title.

Biker wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 5:48 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 5:44 pm

HighNDry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm I don't know who's dumber, this dude or the fishing laws.

Stringent fishing laws are necessary because certain geniuses think fish are an unlimited resource. Yknow, like oil. You can't see the bottom of the barrel therefore there isn't one.

Peak oil again?

It's sad that no one ever played peek-a-boo with you.

I don’t fish, so didn’t know the backstory to the laws. Forgive me.