So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Moderator: Animal
So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
How much sigh of relief, almost joy ( probably also Prince Harry and mother Meghan) can you imagine when baby Sussex didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby. The whole population of England probably sighed tons of relief.
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 14428
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12854
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
It was a little hard to tell with the kid basically all covered up.....but he looked a little mocha-chocolate to me. At least he wasn't a ginger
I blame Biker.
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 14428
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Half chocolate babies with a head full of Afro hair aren't normal?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:25 pm didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby.
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Not in Iraan, Texas. They leave them out in the desert and beat the mothers that have them with jumper cables in the middle of Iraan City Park.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:54 pmHalf chocolate babies with a head full of Afro hair aren't normal?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:25 pm didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
I don't know why they call this stuff hamburger helper. It does just fine by itself
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 29472
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 14428
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Yeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.Biker wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pmSeriously.Flumper wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
- FSchmertz
- UJR Chief Meme Factchecker
- Posts: 5216
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:37 am
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
What's "being black"?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
The whole concept of "Blackness" is stupid really. I know folks were enslaved with the justification by moronic people, who had happened to have more power at the time, that that made them less human. That was wrong but not the first time humans have done stuff like that, and humans still denigrate "people who aren't superior types like them." Until someone more powerful conquers them who thinks they're the "superior humans."
It's a sick tendency we should always be guarding against, and it would be nice if we could get rid of the tendency forever.
But the simple fact is all Homo Sapiens were originally dark skinned to protect them against Africa's sun. And that's where we all ultimately came from. Racial bias is idiotic.
- PimpDaddy
- Flat and Bony Ass Lover
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:39 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
I agree with AH. A little mocha couldn't hurt. The inbreeding has to stop some time.
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 14428
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
You know nothing. Harry got an inheritance from his Mother's estate, but he gets paid for his royal duties by his Father Prince Charles. (who has his own income)Biker wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:42 pmYou really think thats the same thing?Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:38 pmYeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.Biker wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pmSeriously.Flumper wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
Harry also topped out at $53,000 per year during his 10 year military career.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Yeah, you can take that simplistic approach, but I can guarantee a sigh of relief was heard across the land. Race mixing is fine amongst the peasants, but "we will be damned" in the monarchy is the battle cry. What with 1,000 years of history and hording wealth, what else is there?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 14428
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
STFU and mind your own business. What happens in other countries is none of your concern. Worry about your own problems at home.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 12:25 amYeah, you can take that simplistic approach, but I can guarantee a sigh of relief was heard across the land. Race mixing is fine amongst the peasants, but "we will be damned" in the monarchy is the battle cry. What with 1,000 years of history and hording wealth, what else is there?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 12:25 am With all respect as any mod should enjoy, you are Brit so STFU. None of this concerns you. If your govt had shown the same respect 250 years ago, totally different story/

Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Oh, shit . It seems I started a firestorm. Not my intention at all.
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Wrong country, Canadian Fag. Worry about your "pretty boy" Treadue (whatever spelling, who gives a shit. He rules over idiots and polar bears). Only power that matters.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:38 pmYeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.Biker wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pmSeriously.Flumper wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
This shitheel cannot see his own hypocrisy
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian House Cat
- Posts: 16710
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
Assuming Markle is half and half, the most "black" their kid could be is 25%. Harry is a blue eyed ginger though so he's got a ton of recessive genes floating around thus its entirely possible/probable Markles genes will carry the day in the looks department.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
For some damn reason, I just read those 2 sentences in David Attenborough's own voiceFlumper wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.
Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
- beagleboy
- No life apart from this stupid forum board
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
All Canadian government officials including the military are required by law to pledge their allegiance to the Queen and her heirs. As far as I can tell they really like knowing little Archie is their superior from the day he's born.
- CaptQuint
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles
The Canadian Oath of Allegiance is a promise or declaration of fealty to the Canadian monarch, as personification of the Canadian state, taken, along with other specific oaths of office, by new occupants of various federal and provincial government offices, members of federal, provincial, and municipal police forces, members of the Canadian Armed Forces, and, in some provinces, all lawyers upon admission to the bar. The Oath of Allegiance also makes up the first portion of the Oath of Citizenship, the taking of which is a requirement of obtaining Canadian nationality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_A ... e_(Canada)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk