So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

All the news from the peanut gallery and where all the nasty trash talk fails miserably.
It can get NSFW-ish here: you have been warned!

Moderator: Animal

WestTexasCrude

So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#1

Post by WestTexasCrude »

How much sigh of relief, almost joy ( probably also Prince Harry and mother Meghan) can you imagine when baby Sussex didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby. The whole population of England probably sighed tons of relief.
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14428
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#2

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Image
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#3

Post by AnalHamster »

I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#4

Post by CaptQuint »

Image
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12854
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#5

Post by Stapes »

It was a little hard to tell with the kid basically all covered up.....but he looked a little mocha-chocolate to me. At least he wasn't a ginger
I blame Biker.
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14428
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#6

Post by Reservoir Dog »

WestTexasCrude wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:25 pm didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby.
Half chocolate babies with a head full of Afro hair aren't normal?
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#7

Post by CaptQuint »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:54 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:25 pm didn't come out half chocolate with a head full of Afro hair? Just a normal baby.
Half chocolate babies with a head full of Afro hair aren't normal?
Not in Iraan, Texas. They leave them out in the desert and beat the mothers that have them with jumper cables in the middle of Iraan City Park.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#8

Post by CaptQuint »

I don't know why they call this stuff hamburger helper. It does just fine by itself
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29472
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#9

Post by Animal »

It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.

Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14428
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#10

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Biker wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.

Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Seriously.

Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
Yeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.
User avatar
FSchmertz
UJR Chief Meme Factchecker
Posts: 5216
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:37 am

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#11

Post by FSchmertz »

AnalHamster wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
What's "being black"?

The whole concept of "Blackness" is stupid really. I know folks were enslaved with the justification by moronic people, who had happened to have more power at the time, that that made them less human. That was wrong but not the first time humans have done stuff like that, and humans still denigrate "people who aren't superior types like them." Until someone more powerful conquers them who thinks they're the "superior humans."

It's a sick tendency we should always be guarding against, and it would be nice if we could get rid of the tendency forever.

But the simple fact is all Homo Sapiens were originally dark skinned to protect them against Africa's sun. And that's where we all ultimately came from. Racial bias is idiotic.
User avatar
PimpDaddy
Flat and Bony Ass Lover
Posts: 1195
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:39 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#12

Post by PimpDaddy »

I agree with AH. A little mocha couldn't hurt. The inbreeding has to stop some time.
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14428
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#13

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Biker wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:42 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:38 pm
Biker wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.

Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Seriously.

Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
Yeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.
You really think thats the same thing?
You know nothing. Harry got an inheritance from his Mother's estate, but he gets paid for his royal duties by his Father Prince Charles. (who has his own income)
Harry also topped out at $53,000 per year during his 10 year military career.
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#14

Post by WestTexasCrude »

AnalHamster wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
Yeah, you can take that simplistic approach, but I can guarantee a sigh of relief was heard across the land. Race mixing is fine amongst the peasants, but "we will be damned" in the monarchy is the battle cry. What with 1,000 years of history and hording wealth, what else is there?
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14428
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#15

Post by Reservoir Dog »

WestTexasCrude wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 12:25 am
AnalHamster wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm I think most people in england are less racist than you so really no biggie. Bit of darkie blood in the royals would actually be a plus in these modern times. Personally I was genuinely surprised to find out meghan markle thinks she's black, since she isn't. I guess I just take an overly simplistic approach on skin colour with the whole using my eyes thing.
Yeah, you can take that simplistic approach, but I can guarantee a sigh of relief was heard across the land. Race mixing is fine amongst the peasants, but "we will be damned" in the monarchy is the battle cry. What with 1,000 years of history and hording wealth, what else is there?
STFU and mind your own business. What happens in other countries is none of your concern. Worry about your own problems at home.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#16

Post by CaptQuint »

WestTexasCrude wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 12:25 am With all respect as any mod should enjoy, you are Brit so STFU. None of this concerns you. If your govt had shown the same respect 250 years ago, totally different story/
:lol:
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#17

Post by WestTexasCrude »

CaptQuint wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:49 pm Image
:lol:
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#18

Post by WestTexasCrude »

Oh, shit . It seems I started a firestorm. Not my intention at all.
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#19

Post by WestTexasCrude »

Stapes wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 10:50 pm It was a little hard to tell with the kid basically all covered up.....but he looked a little mocha-chocolate to me. At least he wasn't a ginger
:lol: :lol:/ I understand Staples is infected with them. What's that UJ gingers name? Dirkgurk or something.
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#20

Post by WestTexasCrude »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:38 pm
Biker wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.

Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
Seriously.

Imagine being Harry; little responsibility, a true royal, and a lifestyle picked up by the suckers paying taxes in the UK.
Yeah, just like those American suckers paying taxes so Trump can go golfing for a 1/4 of his presidency.
Wrong country, Canadian Fag. Worry about your "pretty boy" Treadue (whatever spelling, who gives a shit. He rules over idiots and polar bears). Only power that matters.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#21

Post by CaptQuint »

This shitheel cannot see his own hypocrisy
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian House Cat
Posts: 16710
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#22

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Assuming Markle is half and half, the most "black" their kid could be is 25%. Harry is a blue eyed ginger though so he's got a ton of recessive genes floating around thus its entirely possible/probable Markles genes will carry the day in the looks department.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
WestTexasCrude

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#23

Post by WestTexasCrude »

Flumper wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 11:16 pm It seems pretty obvious that the british royals give Harry a long leash and sort of let him do what he wants as long as its not a complete embarrassment. I mean, this child is 7th in line for the throne, which is a huge longshot. So, naming him Archie probably was just an eye roll to the queen.

Prince Williams decisions (who to marry, baby names, etc) are probably made around a conference table in a royal palace room. Prince Harry's decisions are probably relayed to the queen by a nanny
For some damn reason, I just read those 2 sentences in David Attenborough's own voice
User avatar
beagleboy
No life apart from this stupid forum board
Posts: 2120
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: Free born

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#24

Post by beagleboy »

All Canadian government officials including the military are required by law to pledge their allegiance to the Queen and her heirs. As far as I can tell they really like knowing little Archie is their superior from the day he's born.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: So, regarding the British monarchy and upper Nobles

#25

Post by CaptQuint »

Biker wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 1:43 pm
beagleboy wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 1:34 pm All Canadian government officials including the military are required by law to pledge their allegiance to the Queen and her heirs.
Is that true?
The Canadian Oath of Allegiance is a promise or declaration of fealty to the Canadian monarch, as personification of the Canadian state, taken, along with other specific oaths of office, by new occupants of various federal and provincial government offices, members of federal, provincial, and municipal police forces, members of the Canadian Armed Forces, and, in some provinces, all lawyers upon admission to the bar. The Oath of Allegiance also makes up the first portion of the Oath of Citizenship, the taking of which is a requirement of obtaining Canadian nationality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_A ... e_(Canada)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
Post Reply