Why is this funny?
LOLZ (NSFW)
Moderator: Animal
- megman
- Nanook of the North
- Posts: 5702
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
- Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole
LOLZ (NSFW)
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
I blame Biker.
- FreakShowFanatic
- 12 Monkeys and More!
- Posts: 6001
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:17 pm
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 7156
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Glad someone asked. So I don't look like I don't get it. (I don't.)
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- megman
- Nanook of the North
- Posts: 5702
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
- Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
- megman
- Nanook of the North
- Posts: 5702
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
- Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
- HighNDry
- Christ, get a life already!
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:25 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Is the blonde a dude?
Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.
-Mitch Hedberg
-Mitch Hedberg
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
You don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:53 pmThat's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
So price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got itnecronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pmBut they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.captquint wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:00 pmYou don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:53 pm
That's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.
Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
The LOLZ thread isn't very LOLZ.
- QillerDaemon
- Crazy Old Cat Lady
- Posts: 4169
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:35 pm
- Location: Beautiful downtown OrloVista FL
- Interests: キラーデモン
- Occupation: Router/Switch Jockey.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Manly handshake? IDK...
If you can't be a good example, you can still serve as a horrible warning.
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.captquint wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:57 pmSo price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got itnecronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pmBut they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
I'd prefer competition, no monopolies, including the government monopoly, and shitty taxes.analhamster wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:19 pm If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.
Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Maybe?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Did you skip the last part?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pmNice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.captquint wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:57 pmSo price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got itnecronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pm
But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Cause that's what the government is known for. Amirite!!captquint wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:09 pmDid you skip the last part?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pmNice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
If you feel that it is being run incorrectly you can vote in Opposition or run for the position yourself. Or I can stand in front of the company with a sign. One seems more effective than the other.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:10 pmCause that's what the government is known for. Amirite!!captquint wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:09 pmDid you skip the last part?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pm
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
There's only one set of infrastructure. It's an inherent monopoly that can only be mitigated by government regulation. This is why it's one of the areas where public and private actually achieve about the same efficiency results. When private companies get involved they are bound by the kinds of rules that restrain public companies from fucking over their customers.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:08 pmI'd prefer competition, no monopolies, including the government monopoly, and shitty taxes.analhamster wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:19 pm If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.
Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf