Roger Stone is going to prison for helping Trump collude

[Geist]

Totally clears the president.

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

[AnalHamster]

By the way, anyone else notice that anything Stone is being accused of occurred long after the votes were counted?

Wrong again retard.

[CaptQuint]

My question is are we ready to have nonstop ongoing investigations into every president from now on, that's what the result is going to be from this. A political hit job every 4 to 8 years on the winning canidate from the other side. Targeting anyone and everyone until they get enough dirt on the sitting president to impeach or break everyone around them so they no longer have people willing to work with them out of fear of prosecution for anything the opposition
can find or financial ruin?
If there is something lay the cards on the table now, but the amount of partisan attacks is simply making this whole thing reek of a partisan hit job and attempted soft coup.
My 2 cents. If you don't like it then go suck Hillary's dick.

Yeah all they've found is those GRU agents interfering with your election and half the trump team participating in a coverup. It's a witch hunt I tells ya.

To be honest, if we wanted British input in our political process the late 1700's would have been a much duller time period.
Ok, let's see. We had GRU agents trying to interfere how? Sopplying false information? When I voted I didn't have an agent there with a gun to my head.
Poll manipulation? Who the fuck even pays attention to those, if they were accurate at all Hillary would be president. There is evidence of over sampling in the polls leading up.
How about the fake golden dossier about Trump? Where did that come from? Should we have an investigation into that?
Why is the media 90% negative on the current administration? That'd be more influential on public opinion than some bullshit facebook posts. Maybe we should be looking into that, except they have the right to do that as a free enterprise.
So what could the GRU agents do to help sabotage Hillary that she didn't do herself because of sheer arrogance?

Ok, let's see. We had GRU agents trying to interfere how? Sopplying false information

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/0 ... rs-camera/

How about the fake golden dossier about Trump? Where did that come from? Should we have an investigation into that?

Nothing has been disproven in Steele dossier.

Why is the media 90% negative on the current administration?

Because The President attacks the media and calls them fake news and "The Failing New York Times" The President also makes outlandish claims with out evidence.

[Gunzen]

Totally clears the president.

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

[CaptQuint]

Trump's Ex-Lawyer Michael Cohen Acknowledges Scheme To Rig Polls In Presidential Race

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/17/68618223 ... ntial-race

[CaptQuint]

Totally clears the president.

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

Geist is using The Presidents own word you fucking retard

[CaptQuint]

Totally clears the president.

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

Geist is using The Presidents own word you fucking retard

[Geist]

Totally clears the president.

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

I'm saying the evidence presented totally clears the president.

[Gunzen]

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

I'm saying the evidence presented totally clears the president.

I’ll ask again. Clears him of what?

[Blast]

My question is are we ready to have nonstop ongoing investigations into every president from now on, that's what the result is going to be from this. A political hit job every 4 to 8 years on the winning canidate from the other side. Targeting anyone and everyone until they get enough dirt on the sitting president to impeach or break everyone around them so they no longer have people willing to work with them out of fear of prosecution for anything the opposition
can find or financial ruin?
If there is something lay the cards on the table now, but the amount of partisan attacks is simply making this whole thing reek of a partisan hit job and attempted soft coup.
My 2 cents. If you don't like it then go suck Hillary's dick.

Yeah all they've found is those GRU agents interfering with your election and half the trump team participating in a coverup. It's a witch hunt I tells ya.

To be honest, if we wanted British input in our political process the late 1700's would have been a much duller time period.
Ok, let's see. We had GRU agents trying to interfere how? Sopplying false information? When I voted I didn't have an agent there with a gun to my head.
Poll manipulation? Who the fuck even pays attention to those, if they were accurate at all Hillary would be president. There is evidence of over sampling in the polls leading up.
How about the fake golden dossier about Trump? Where did that come from? Should we have an investigation into that?
Why is the media 90% negative on the current administration? That'd be more influential on public opinion than some bullshit facebook posts. Maybe we should be looking into that, except they have the right to do that as a free enterprise.
So what could the GRU agents help do to help sabotage Hillary that she didn't do herself because of sheer arrogance?

They hacked the DNC then coordinated damaging releases with the trump campaign through wikileaks, while also running a social media campaign. It's voter manipulation, not poll manipulation, which while off were in fact within the margin of error. You didn't have a GRU agent with a gun to your head, the problem is the limited intelligence of that head, it renders you susceptible to propaganda. Why not just come out and say you have no problem with russians interfering in your elections so long as they back your side? That is what you are saying here.

The dossier was started by the RNC doing oppo research into trump. It was taken over by the DNC for the same reason. It was not released before the election, did not spark the investigation, and while only parts of it are proven, none of it is disproven.

The media is negative because the administration is grossly incompetent and keeps appointing incompetent and corrupt people. Did you notice the 35 day fail that just happened?

Gotta disagree with b you on all counts Anal. Sorry. The dossier was rumored before the election and released in full afterwards.
Once again I do need to cite Hillary herself in the loss. Her arrogance, inaction on certain occurrences, ties to the sale of uranium and the questionable donation timing to the Clinton Foundation by Russian firms, the emails she deleted from a personal server of questionable legality, and poor political tacticle decisions where very much at the heart of the issue of why she lost. Not to mention that the media was trying to ramrod her our throats. That did not help her with those who have a bit of a contradictory streak in them.
The Russians where trying to hack both political parties till really mess with us, though the attacks on the GOP emails were unsuccessful. Imagine the havoc that could have come from emails from both sides that were not meant for public consumption?
The media is negative because he does not agree with their combined beleifs and in keeping with human nature, anything we do not agree with most be destroyed.

[Gunzen]

Clears him of what? He hasn’t even been accused of anything let alone indicted.

The only people who actually are accusing him or indicting him are the media and the left.

There is nothing to clear...yet.

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

I'm saying the evidence presented totally clears the president.

I’ll ask again. Clears him of what?

[Geist]

You're right, very legal and very cool.

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

I'm saying the evidence presented totally clears the president.

I’ll ask again. Clears him of what?

Being a witch I think. I'm not sure either.

[CaptQuint]

[CaptQuint]

[AnalHamster]

My question is are we ready to have nonstop ongoing investigations into every president from now on, that's what the result is going to be from this. A political hit job every 4 to 8 years on the winning canidate from the other side. Targeting anyone and everyone until they get enough dirt on the sitting president to impeach or break everyone around them so they no longer have people willing to work with them out of fear of prosecution for anything the opposition
can find or financial ruin?
If there is something lay the cards on the table now, but the amount of partisan attacks is simply making this whole thing reek of a partisan hit job and attempted soft coup.
My 2 cents. If you don't like it then go suck Hillary's dick.

Yeah all they've found is those GRU agents interfering with your election and half the trump team participating in a coverup. It's a witch hunt I tells ya.

To be honest, if we wanted British input in our political process the late 1700's would have been a much duller time period.
Ok, let's see. We had GRU agents trying to interfere how? Sopplying false information? When I voted I didn't have an agent there with a gun to my head.
Poll manipulation? Who the fuck even pays attention to those, if they were accurate at all Hillary would be president. There is evidence of over sampling in the polls leading up.
How about the fake golden dossier about Trump? Where did that come from? Should we have an investigation into that?
Why is the media 90% negative on the current administration? That'd be more influential on public opinion than some bullshit facebook posts. Maybe we should be looking into that, except they have the right to do that as a free enterprise.
So what could the GRU agents help do to help sabotage Hillary that she didn't do herself because of sheer arrogance?

They hacked the DNC then coordinated damaging releases with the trump campaign through wikileaks, while also running a social media campaign. It's voter manipulation, not poll manipulation, which while off were in fact within the margin of error. You didn't have a GRU agent with a gun to your head, the problem is the limited intelligence of that head, it renders you susceptible to propaganda. Why not just come out and say you have no problem with russians interfering in your elections so long as they back your side? That is what you are saying here.

The dossier was started by the RNC doing oppo research into trump. It was taken over by the DNC for the same reason. It was not released before the election, did not spark the investigation, and while only parts of it are proven, none of it is disproven.

The media is negative because the administration is grossly incompetent and keeps appointing incompetent and corrupt people. Did you notice the 35 day fail that just happened?

Gotta disagree with b you on all counts Anal. Sorry. The dossier was rumored before the election and released in full afterwards.
Once again I do need to cite Hillary herself in the loss. Her arrogance, inaction on certain occurrences, ties to the sale of uranium and the questionable donation timing to the Clinton Foundation by Russian firms, the emails she deleted from a personal server of questionable legality, and poor political tacticle decisions where very much at the heart of the issue of why she lost. Not to mention that the media was trying to ramrod her our throats. That did not help her with those who have a bit of a contradictory streak in them.
The Russians where trying to hack both political parties till really mess with us, though the attacks on the GOP emails were unsuccessful. Imagine the havoc that could have come from emails from both sides that were not meant for public consumption?
The media is negative because he does not agree with their combined beleifs and in keeping with human nature, admitting we do not agree with most be destroyed.

See what I mean about your susceptibility to propaganda? There was no uranium scandal, and unlike the trump foundation which got shut down with the principles banned from running one for 7 years, the clinton foundation withstood scrutiny. The emails were extensively investigated finding bupkiss, benghazi was the most investigated thing ever, you just get duped a lot. These things are intended to dupe you, then you go with conspiracy theories rather than reality when nothing is found, over and over.

You're part right on one thing, the Russians did try to hack both political parties, but successfully. But they only released damaging information on one of them, because they were trying to get trump elected. Not sure what you're getting at with the dossier being 'rumored'. That it existed? It did. Obama chose to keep it and suspicions of russian interference under wraps for fear of influencing the election.

Do you think shutting down the government for 35 days then folding with nothing showed competence? The trump administration is objectively incompetent, that's just the latest major example. The media is negative because he's incompetent, his appointees are the worst of the swamp and he constantly tells and repeats blatant lies.

[Gunzen]

Please cite the law he broke, I’ll wait.

Is Trump speak not simple enough for you to understand? VERY legal, and VERY cool.

I don’t even know what you are saying.

I'm saying the evidence presented totally clears the president.

I’ll ask again. Clears him of what?

Being a witch I think. I'm not sure either.

I would believe that before collusion.

[CaptQuint]

McConnell refused to sign bipartisan statement on Russian interference so Obama said nothing because he cares about optics

[Geist]

My question is are we ready to have nonstop ongoing investigations into every president from now on, that's what the result is going to be from this. A political hit job every 4 to 8 years on the winning canidate from the other side. Targeting anyone and everyone until they get enough dirt on the sitting president to impeach or break everyone around them so they no longer have people willing to work with them out of fear of prosecution for anything the opposition
can find or financial ruin?
If there is something lay the cards on the table now, but the amount of partisan attacks is simply making this whole thing reek of a partisan hit job and attempted soft coup.
My 2 cents. If you don't like it then go suck Hillary's dick.

Yeah all they've found is those GRU agents interfering with your election and half the trump team participating in a coverup. It's a witch hunt I tells ya.

To be honest, if we wanted British input in our political process the late 1700's would have been a much duller time period.
Ok, let's see. We had GRU agents trying to interfere how? Sopplying false information? When I voted I didn't have an agent there with a gun to my head.
Poll manipulation? Who the fuck even pays attention to those, if they were accurate at all Hillary would be president. There is evidence of over sampling in the polls leading up.
How about the fake golden dossier about Trump? Where did that come from? Should we have an investigation into that?
Why is the media 90% negative on the current administration? That'd be more influential on public opinion than some bullshit facebook posts. Maybe we should be looking into that, except they have the right to do that as a free enterprise.
So what could the GRU agents help do to help sabotage Hillary that she didn't do herself because of sheer arrogance?

They hacked the DNC then coordinated damaging releases with the trump campaign through wikileaks, while also running a social media campaign. It's voter manipulation, not poll manipulation, which while off were in fact within the margin of error. You didn't have a GRU agent with a gun to your head, the problem is the limited intelligence of that head, it renders you susceptible to propaganda. Why not just come out and say you have no problem with russians interfering in your elections so long as they back your side? That is what you are saying here.

The dossier was started by the RNC doing oppo research into trump. It was taken over by the DNC for the same reason. It was not released before the election, did not spark the investigation, and while only parts of it are proven, none of it is disproven.

The media is negative because the administration is grossly incompetent and keeps appointing incompetent and corrupt people. Did you notice the 35 day fail that just happened?

Gotta disagree with b you on all counts Anal. Sorry. The dossier was rumored before the election and released in full afterwards.
Once again I do need to cite Hillary herself in the loss. Her arrogance, inaction on certain occurrences, ties to the sale of uranium and the questionable donation timing to the Clinton Foundation by Russian firms, the emails she deleted from a personal server of questionable legality, and poor political tacticle decisions where very much at the heart of the issue of why she lost. Not to mention that the media was trying to ramrod her our throats. That did not help her with those who have a bit of a contradictory streak in them.
The Russians where trying to hack both political parties till really mess with us, though the attacks on the GOP emails were unsuccessful. Imagine the havoc that could have come from emails from both sides that were not meant for public consumption?
The media is negative because he does not agree with their combined beleifs and in keeping with human nature, admitting we do not agree with most be destroyed.

See what I mean about your susceptibility to propaganda? There was no uranium scandal, and unlike the trump foundation which got shut down with the principles banned from running one for 7 years, the clinton foundation withstood scrutiny. The emails were extensively investigated finding bupkiss, benghazi was the most investigated thing ever, you just get duped a lot. These things are intended to dupe you, then you go with conspiracy theories rather than reality when nothing is found, over and over.

You're part right on one thing, the Russians did try to hack both political parties, but successfully. But they only released damaging information on one of them, because they were trying to get trump elected. Not sure what you're getting at with the dossier being 'rumored'. That it existed? It did. Obama chose to keep it and suspicions of russian interference under wraps for fear of influencing the election.

Do you think shutting down the government for 35 days then folding with nothing showed competence? The trump administration is objectively incompetent, that's just the latest major example. The media is negative because he's incompetent, his appointees are the worst of the swamp and he constantly tells and repeats blatant lies.

But you're forgetting that the left-winger Dems at the FBI deliberately covered up for Hillary while our sitting president is being witch hunted by lifelong Democrat sleeper cell Bob Mueller.

[CaptQuint]

BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST

INFOWARS.COM

[Animal]

Here's a thought. Why not start an investigation into the russians tampering with our election process. Leave Trump and any other americans names out of the investigation.

THEN............. if you can find the russians guilty of election charges, THEN you find something linking Trump (or his staff) as being willing partners or connected to the "already proven allegations".

Wouldn't that seem like a more non partisan approach? Prove the crime and then determine the participants?

[CaptQuint]

Here's a thought. Why not start an investigation into the russians tampering with our election process. Leave Trump and any other americans names out of the investigation.

THEN............. if you can find the russians guilty of election charges, THEN you find something linking Trump (or his staff) as being willing partners or connected to the "already proven allegations".

Wouldn't that seem like a more non partisan approach? Prove the crime and then determine the participants?

Mueller has already charged 26 Russian Nationals and three Russian organizations

[Geist]

Here's a thought. Why not start an investigation into the russians tampering with our election process. Leave Trump and any other americans names out of the investigation.

THEN............. if you can find the russians guilty of election charges, THEN you find something linking Trump (or his staff) as being willing partners or connected to the "already proven allegations".

Wouldn't that seem like a more non partisan approach? Prove the crime and then determine the participants?

How would investigators go about referring to participants in criminal activity if they can only be referred to after a crime has been proven? Perhaps numerically? Calling someone "Individual 1" sounds preposterous and surely no one would do that.

[CaptQuint]

[AnalHamster]

Here's a thought. Why not start an investigation into the russians tampering with our election process. Leave Trump and any other americans names out of the investigation.

THEN............. if you can find the russians guilty of election charges, THEN you find something linking Trump (or his staff) as being willing partners or connected to the "already proven allegations".

Wouldn't that seem like a more non partisan approach? Prove the crime and then determine the participants?

Has it ever occurred to you that you might be better informed if you read some of the readily available information on this? Carter Page, richard gates and paul manafort were all under investigation for links to russia before trump hired them, before the campaign had even begun. Wiretaps on Russians talking about and to trump associates got them swept up in the investigation, then their lying about it got them fucked. Counterintelligence operations don't only get launched after criminal investigations conclude, they generally come first, or just run all the time. Trump hired a bunch of people already under investigation for russia links, benefited from a russian intelligence campaign aimed at getting him elected that his campaign actively colluded with, and tried to obstruct the investigation. Open your eyes.

[Gunzen]

Here's a thought. Why not start an investigation into the russians tampering with our election process. Leave Trump and any other americans names out of the investigation.

THEN............. if you can find the russians guilty of election charges, THEN you find something linking Trump (or his staff) as being willing partners or connected to the "already proven allegations".

Wouldn't that seem like a more non partisan approach? Prove the crime and then determine the participants?

There is nothing new about messing with elections. Barack Obama went to rhe UK and spoke against Brexit. Thank God he is a loser and everyone he backs loses. But do you see the Irony?

We expect Russia to stay out of our business but Obama can openly campaign against Brexit and also speak against Netanyahu as well.

But we are butthurt because the Russians bought a few Facebook adds? If unfuckingreal. Who the fuck do we think we are? And all of this Russian hacking happened BEFORE TRUMP. why isn’t this on Obama? This has gone in forever, only reason anybody cares now is because Trump beat Hillary. You really think this would happen if Hillary won?

The US has no right to be pissed about election influence just because the RUSSIANS (allegedly) did it serruptitiously.

Here he urges against Brexit while in the UK



This is such a fucking joke. Collusion isn’t even against the law. We do it all the time.