So Much Winning

[Biker]

So just to clarify for the next democratic president, fine to make billions from insider trading, selling access, selling regulations, taking money from foreigners, so long as it's not direct transfers from the treasury. That's your carefully considered moral and legal position that you think applies to the presidency in general, and any of the children of the president, e.g hunter biden. Just open season in corruption, with your one caveat that government funds need to be channeled through 3rd parties

Is there any evidence for your allegations or are you just running your mouth and throwing out anything that comes to mind? The bulk of his income last year came from that stupid shit coin his sons put out, which is not illegal.

[dot]

There is no evidence that he enriched himself from taxpayer funds. Stop lying

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ ... -explained

And that's just the first term. Who was right, you're barely trying anymore in the face of the facts. But by all means, keep embarrassing yourself.

Honestly not sure why you or any of the cultists are still pretending at this point to have standards of any kind.

[Biker]

Oh, so a leftist organization twists themselves into making a case for corruption? GTFO


Do better with your evidence

[AnalHamster]

So just to clarify for the next democratic president, fine to make billions from insider trading, selling access, selling regulations, taking money from foreigners, so long as it's not direct transfers from the treasury. That's your carefully considered moral and legal position that you think applies to the presidency in general, and any of the children of the president, e.g hunter biden. Just open season in corruption, with your one caveat that government funds need to be channeled through 3rd parties

Is there any evidence for your allegations or are you just running your mouth and throwing out anything that comes to mind? The bulk of his income last year came from that stupid shit coin his sons put out, which is not illegal.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... rypto-deal

Let's see if you can read before I waste time. Summarise the article to prove your read it and the cognitive dissonance didn't block anything going in

[Biker]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

[AnalHamster]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

[Biker]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

[AnalHamster]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

[Biker]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

[AnalHamster]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

It should be, if it happened, nah? you traitorous fucking hypocrite?

[AnalHamster]

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

So you are just fucking delusional

[Biker]

So, two crypto deals with the UAE royal family. I noted that the article failed to cite an exact criminal charge, unless a family makes money while the dad is president is illegal. Did you actually read it?

Carry on.

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

It should be, if it happened, nah? you traitorous fucking hypocrite?

If thats the actual case, then yes, impeach him. But the article also indicated that there are still gaps to determine if anything illegal took place.

[AnalHamster]

In addition to scamming a million or so of his dummy fans, large investments in his junk coin which he made hundreds of billions on were made by sophisticated foreign investors. Why do you think that was?
Did the top investors in chump coin get anything other than financial loss?

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

It should be, if it happened, nah? you traitorous fucking hypocrite?

If thats the actual case, then yes, impeach him. But the article also indicated that there are still gaps to determine if anything illegal took place.

Gee why would there be gaps in the complete absence of any investigation due to all republicans who aren't retiring being sycophantic pussies?

When the corrupt chumpers lose the mid terms and the flood gates open you're just going to switch to calling it a witch hunt, you treacherous traitorous delusional coward.

[Biker]

Obviously the article implied that the UAE got a special deal on AI chips. That may or may not be true.

Dumbasses who invest in a shit coin arent necessarily victims of a crime. You understand that, right

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

It should be, if it happened, nah? you traitorous fucking hypocrite?

If thats the actual case, then yes, impeach him. But the article also indicated that there are still gaps to determine if anything illegal took place.

Gee why would there be gaps in the complete absence of any investigation due to all republicans who aren't retiring being sycophantic pussies?

When the corrupt chumpers lose the mid terms and the flood gates open you're just going to switch to calling it a witch hunt, you treacherous traitorous delusional coward.

I literally just wrote that if criminal conduct took place, impeach him. One step further, jail the cunt if found guilty

But thats not the answer you want. You want complete TDS on my part and even then that may not be enough to cease calling me a 'treacherous traitor'. Youre acting like a disingenuous fuckwit

[AnalHamster]

So you're saying it appears trump took a bribe through chump coin from a foreign government to grant them favours through the US government, and this is fine if it's not a crime for the president (and only the president) to do?
So if Obama had made a billion from Obama coin, bought mostly by Venezuela, and then lifted all sanctions and gave Chavez a hummer, no issue?

No issue if President Newsome changes the regs on crypto to profit from his crypto currency next?

You're either delusional or lying if you can even pretend to answer that.

Even the article mentioned that there is no link, although it may look inappropriate. You read the whole thing, right?

Hunter Biden sold shit paintings for millions to people who wanted access to Joe, which he of course granted. Is that a crime or nah?

It should be, if it happened, nah? you traitorous fucking hypocrite?

If thats the actual case, then yes, impeach him. But the article also indicated that there are still gaps to determine if anything illegal took place.

Gee why would there be gaps in the complete absence of any investigation due to all republicans who aren't retiring being sycophantic pussies?

When the corrupt chumpers lose the mid terms and the flood gates open you're just going to switch to calling it a witch hunt, you treacherous traitorous delusional coward.

I literally just wrote that if criminal conduct took place, impeach him. One step further, jail the cunt if found guilty

But thats not the answer you want. You want complete TDS on my part and even then that may not be enough to cease calling me a 'treacherous traitor'. Youre acting like a disingenuous fuckwit

What if criminal conduct did not take place because the supreme court has ruled the king is above the law? Are you fine with Hunter biden doing it? Are you fine with president Newsome and family doing it? Are you fine with chump doing it openly on an epically grander scale than any other president ever? Are you fine with fucking corruption you fucking traitorous shit? Are you fine with the collapse of your own constitution if the shit stain doing it is wearing the right coloured hat? Fucking coward. Fucking traitor.
You put party affiliation above the constitution. You'd rather see a corrupt lying shyster as dictator than accept a democratically elected democrat. You're a fucking disgrace.

Your country needs to split and send all the morons to Jesusland. I really don't think there's any other way to save it at this point.

[Biker]

Youre right, in that there is too much room to maneuver between policy and business amongst our politicians. There needs reform, I'll grant you that

Hysterical that someone who is being overrun with thrid world peasants that rape his women and dont share Western values is telling an American that our country is not salvageable. Fuck off.

And speaking of traitors, why have you allowed your women to get groomed and raped, while you sat by and shamed those who pointed it out? Not sure how you leftist Brits look yourselves in the mirror each day

[dot]

Oh, so a leftist organization twists themselves into making a case for corruption? GTFO


Do better with your evidence

Dismissing facts out of hand because you can't defend the corruption doesn't erase the corruption from existence. Besides which, we both know this is nothing you don't already know about, so once again I'm not sure why you're pretending anymore. Hammy already pegged you again as the traitorous coward that you are, and Who already identified your heart not being in the excuses you're throwing out. You're not fooling anyone here, likely not even yourself. So GFY instead.

[AnalHamster]

Youre right, in that there is too much room to maneuver between policy and business amongst our politicians. There needs reform, I'll grant you that

Hysterical that someone who is being overrun with thrid world peasants that rape his women and dont share Western values is telling an American that our country is not salvageable. Fuck off.

And speaking of traitors, why have you allowed your women to get groomed and raped, while you sat by and shamed those who pointed it out? Not sure how you leftist Brits look yourselves in the mirror each day

Yeah, can't post much due to hiding from all the imaginary rape gangs coming for my women. This is definitely not at all your fantasist echo chamber, I have to go now and protect my wife from minority rape.

Fuckwit.

[Biker]

Youre right, in that there is too much room to maneuver between policy and business amongst our politicians. There needs reform, I'll grant you that

Hysterical that someone who is being overrun with thrid world peasants that rape his women and dont share Western values is telling an American that our country is not salvageable. Fuck off.

And speaking of traitors, why have you allowed your women to get groomed and raped, while you sat by and shamed those who pointed it out? Not sure how you leftist Brits look yourselves in the mirror each day

Yeah, can't post much due to hiding from all the imaginary rape gangs coming for my women. This is definitely not at all your fantasist echo chamber, I have to go now and protect my wife from minority rape.

Fuckwit.

‘Imaginary’ Pathetic

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... Report.pdf

[Biker]

Oh, so a leftist organization twists themselves into making a case for corruption? GTFO


Do better with your evidence

Dismissing facts out of hand because you can't defend the corruption doesn't erase the corruption from existence. Besides which, we both know this is nothing you don't already know about, so once again I'm not sure why you're pretending anymore. Hammy already pegged you again as the traitorous coward that you are, and Who already identified your heart not being in the excuses you're throwing out. You're not fooling anyone here, likely not even yourself. So GFY instead.

Nice goalpost move. So we’re back to the golf trips, eh?

The article you cited talks about all the jobs cuts. That must mean you think the govt has beeen running a tight, efficient ship and it couldn’t spare one job loss. Is that your position?

[dot]

Nice goalpost move. So we’re back to the golf trips, eh?

Where's the goalposts being moved? He's sucking up taxpayer dollars for his own businesses, corruption plain and simple. That's not the only corruption he's engaged in, but it's interesting that you can't address it or defend it, so you just ignore it.

The article you cited talks about all the jobs cuts.

It talks about his self dealing with my and your money. Just gonna ignore that too cause it's still indefensible? The fact that you glommed onto a single part of the headline and a mention of his slashing of government jobs to ignore the vast bulk of what was reported regarding his taxpayer funded joyrides to his own properties just further emphasizes how little heart you have in this anymore. You couldn't even be bothered to read the reporting, you just looked for an exit ramp. So once again, why are you still pretending?

That must mean you think the govt has beeen running a tight, efficient ship and it couldn’t spare one job loss. Is that your position?

Your continued attempt at deflection is noted as you could not address, explain, defend, the blatant corruption you are well aware of. And I reiterate, that's just the first term. His second term is leaps and bounds worse, but that's just another thing you're limply refusing to admit despite overwhelming evidence. So I ask again, why is the cowardly little traitorous bitch still pretending?