Cheezy's Very Own Conservative Echo Chamber!

[dot]

It's literally just watching the video, you clown.
Where is the "beating"?

Once again, if you did the slightest amount of research instead of swallowing the fascist propaganda line, you'd know you were dead wrong on all fronts here. Just like the murder, and the other woman you still refuse to acknowledge. Now, would that change your behavior? No, because you're also a bad faith traitorous partisan hack on top of your fascist apologies. That's why despite the aggressor fascist goons advancing on the legal US citizen and lunging at him, the citizen being attacked then pinned to the ground, injured traumatized and unlawfully arrested then released without charges miles away from the crime scene dumped from the vehicle, we got the usual suspect here denying any such attack happened.

I didn't make the claim, he did and then couldn't back it up.

Saying "nuh-uh" doesn't measure up to the weight of the video of the incident proving you wrong, fascist apologist.

Dodgin' Dot lives in the bluest of blue bubbles.

I'm posting from red BFE proving you wrong in your own echo chamber thread. Denying the reality of the situation in the face of all the evidence only proves you're the one operating from your own hug box. So, yet another confession masked as accusation from you. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

[Animal]

Once again, if you did the slightest amount of research instead of swallowing the fascist propaganda line, you'd know you were dead wrong on all fronts here. Just like the murder, and the other woman you still refuse to acknowledge. Now, would that change your behavior? No, because you're also a bad faith traitorous partisan hack on top of your fascist apologies. That's why despite the aggressor fascist goons advancing on the legal US citizen and lunging at him, the citizen being attacked then pinned to the ground, injured traumatized and unlawfully arrested then released without charges miles away from the crime scene dumped from the vehicle, we got the usual suspect here denying any such attack happened.
Saying "nuh-uh" doesn't measure up to the weight of the video of the incident proving you wrong, fascist apologist.
I'm posting from red BFE proving you wrong in your own echo chamber thread. Denying the reality of the situation in the face of all the evidence only proves you're the one operating from your own hug box. So, yet another confession masked as accusation from you. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

[dot]

.

[Animal]

.

face it, stupid. ICE has been around a long time and their job is to find illegal aliens that have gotten into the country and deport them. That's the way its always been. They are going to do their job no matter the temper tantrum you and the other women throw.

[dot]

face it, stupid. ICE has been around a long time and their job is to find illegal aliens that have gotten into the country and deport them. That's the way its always been. They are going to do their job no matter the temper tantrum you and the other women throw.

And now you're the one having a stroke because you're off having a different conversation than what's being discussed. Let me know when you want to stop deflecting from ICE attacking, detaining, deporting, withholding due process, murdering US citizens. If you can't address the problem, you're just apologizing for the fascism by default. If you only want to focus on what they are doing regarding illegals, okay, the ICE rapists could use a defender so feel free to sign up for that. Perhaps rounding up people at asylum hearings, a legal proceeding, maybe that's what you'd rather spend your time defending since illegal and legal entry to the country are now equally punished. But here is the discussion regarding the brutality against our own citizens by masked poorly trained thugs that don't know or care about law. Pick your poison.

[CHEEZY17]

It's literally just watching the video, you clown.
Where is the "beating"?

Once again, if you did the slightest amount of research instead of swallowing the fascist propaganda line, you'd know you were dead wrong on all fronts here. Just like the murder, and the other woman you still refuse to acknowledge. Now, would that change your behavior? No, because you're also a bad faith traitorous partisan hack on top of your fascist apologies. That's why despite the aggressor fascist goons advancing on the legal US citizen and lunging at him, the citizen being attacked then pinned to the ground, injured traumatized and unlawfully arrested then released without charges miles away from the crime scene dumped from the vehicle, we got the usual suspect here denying any such attack happened.

I didn't make the claim, he did and then couldn't back it up.

Saying "nuh-uh" doesn't measure up to the weight of the video of the incident proving you wrong, fascist apologist.

Dodgin' Dot lives in the bluest of blue bubbles.

I'm posting from red BFE proving you wrong in your own echo chamber thread. Denying the reality of the situation in the face of all the evidence only proves you're the one operating from your own hug box. So, yet another confession masked as accusation from you. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

Your own video doesn't show what you claim you fucking retard.
There is no "storming in". There is no "beating".
What there is though is an obstructing douchebag being detained like any other obstructing douchebag.
Your residence in a red area doesn't mean you're not living in a blue bubble. You seek and consume only left leaning media. That's what the "bubble" part means.

[dot]

Your own video doesn't show what you claim you fucking retard.
There is no "storming in". There is no "beating".
What there is though is an obstructing douchebag being detained like any other obstructing douchebag.
Your residence in a red area doesn't mean you're not living in a blue bubble. You seek and consume only left leaning media. That's what the "bubble" part means.

Sit there and lie because reality doesn't agree with you, you're not fooling anyone. There's a reason you won't acknowledge the facts, just like with the murder and the other woman's abduction that you cannot bring yourself to acknowledge, because the facts prove you wrong and have been for a very long time. Wishing it didn't happen the way it happened doesn't change what took place. You see the fascist goons advance, lunge, tackle, beat, arrest without cause, release without charges after injury. Saying that didn't happen citing non existent interference and obstruction when the incident was caught on video just proves yet again you are a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist. So again, keep proving me right. It's been super easy to do, here in your own little echo chamber hug box, which is why you were left woefully underinformed about these incidents. You refuse to do your own research, preferring your bubble thus leading to another confession masked as accusation. Don't be upset that the facts didn't turn out the way you wanted them to, educate yourself first next time and save yourself the embarrassment. Or don't, and continue making a fool of yourself.

[CHEEZY17]

Your own video doesn't show what you claim you fucking retard.
There is no "storming in". There is no "beating".
What there is though is an obstructing douchebag being detained like any other obstructing douchebag.
Your residence in a red area doesn't mean you're not living in a blue bubble. You seek and consume only left leaning media. That's what the "bubble" part means.

Sit there and lie because reality doesn't agree with you, you're not fooling anyone. There's a reason you won't acknowledge the facts, just like with the murder and the other woman's abduction that you cannot bring yourself to acknowledge, because the facts prove you wrong and have been for a very long time. Wishing it didn't happen the way it happened doesn't change what took place. You see the fascist goons advance, lunge, tackle, beat, arrest without cause, release without charges after injury. Saying that didn't happen citing non existent interference and obstruction when the incident was caught on video just proves yet again you are a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist. So again, keep proving me right. It's been super easy to do, here in your own little echo chamber hug box, which is why you were left woefully underinformed about these incidents. You refuse to do your own research, preferring your bubble thus leading to another confession masked as accusation. Don't be upset that the facts didn't turn out the way you wanted them to, educate yourself first next time and save yourself the embarrassment. Or don't, and continue making a fool of yourself.

Your research consists of the video you posted which shows the obstructionist getting in the way of the officer and possibly throwing a punch. Your own partisan narrator even admits that. We then see him being detained. What's missing? Your claim of him being beaten.
If you have some other "research" that shows the beating you claim happened go ahead and post it because your original video sure as shit doesn't show it.

[dot]

Your research consists of the video you posted which shows the obstructionist getting in the way of the officer and possibly throwing a punch. Your own partisan narrator even admits that. We then see him being detained. What's missing? Your claim of him being beaten.
If you have some other "research" that shows the beating you claim happened go ahead and post it because your original video sure as shit doesn't show it.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

[Reservoir Dog]

Your research consists of the video you posted which shows the obstructionist getting in the way of the officer and possibly throwing a punch. Your own partisan narrator even admits that. We then see him being detained. What's missing? Your claim of him being beaten.
If you have some other "research" that shows the beating you claim happened go ahead and post it because your original video sure as shit doesn't show it.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

hE TrIEd tO RuN tHeM oVeR WiTh hIS cAR !!!!!!!!

[Reservoir Dog]

Donald Trump can fuck right off and die.
I hope he strokes out and shits his pants on live TV.

[dot]

[CHEEZY17]

Your research consists of the video you posted which shows the obstructionist getting in the way of the officer and possibly throwing a punch. Your own partisan narrator even admits that. We then see him being detained. What's missing? Your claim of him being beaten.
If you have some other "research" that shows the beating you claim happened go ahead and post it because your original video sure as shit doesn't show it.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

You keep typing a lot of words but none of those words can point to the "beating" that you insist happened. Be specific: what is the exact time in your original video of the "beating"?
The obstructer jumped in front of the Law Enforcement Officer impeding his progress (48 seconds). That is called "obstruction". At this point it appears that a punch may have also been thrown towards the agent. It is at this time that the LEO detained the obstructer and removed him from the location.

"Obstruction/Interference: If a citizen physically blocks agents, causes a disturbance, or refuses to get out of the way during an enforcement action, they can be detained or arrested for interfering with law enforcement duties." 18 U.S.C. § 111

[dot]

You keep typing a lot of words but none of those words can point to the "beating" that you insist happened. Be specific: what is the exact time in your original video of the "beating"?
The obstructer jumped in front of the Law Enforcement Officer impeding his progress (48 seconds). That is called "obstruction". At this point it appears that a punch may have also been thrown towards the agent. It is at this time that the LEO detained the obstructer and removed him from the location.

"Obstruction/Interference: If a citizen physically blocks agents, causes a disturbance, or refuses to get out of the way during an enforcement action, they can be detained or arrested for interfering with law enforcement duties." 18 U.S.C. § 111

As predicted, you ignored every piece of reality that debunks your fascist propaganda, so I guess we pile on today's murder on top of the previous one, the earlier abduction you still refuse to acknowledge. That's how we know this asshole here knows he backed the wrong horse.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

Keep. Proving. Me. Right. Fascist. Apologist.

[CHEEZY17]

You keep typing a lot of words but none of those words can point to the "beating" that you insist happened. Be specific: what is the exact time in your original video of the "beating"?
The obstructer jumped in front of the Law Enforcement Officer impeding his progress (48 seconds). That is called "obstruction". At this point it appears that a punch may have also been thrown towards the agent. It is at this time that the LEO detained the obstructer and removed him from the location.

"Obstruction/Interference: If a citizen physically blocks agents, causes a disturbance, or refuses to get out of the way during an enforcement action, they can be detained or arrested for interfering with law enforcement duties." 18 U.S.C. § 111

As predicted, you ignored every piece of reality that debunks your fascist propaganda, so I guess we pile on today's murder on top of the previous one, the earlier abduction you still refuse to acknowledge. That's how we know this asshole here knows he backed the wrong horse.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

As predicted you can't pinpoint the "beating" you claim happened, so you change the subject, because there was no beating. If you want to talk about the other incident we can do that but I'm not letting you change the subject here because you can't admit that you got busted in a lie. Where specifically is the "beating" that you insist happened? What is the specific timestamp? Before we move on we need to finish here. Put up or shut up, bud.

[Antknot]

You keep typing a lot of words but none of those words can point to the "beating" that you insist happened. Be specific: what is the exact time in your original video of the "beating"?
The obstructer jumped in front of the Law Enforcement Officer impeding his progress (48 seconds). That is called "obstruction". At this point it appears that a punch may have also been thrown towards the agent. It is at this time that the LEO detained the obstructer and removed him from the location.

"Obstruction/Interference: If a citizen physically blocks agents, causes a disturbance, or refuses to get out of the way during an enforcement action, they can be detained or arrested for interfering with law enforcement duties." 18 U.S.C. § 111

As predicted, you ignored every piece of reality that debunks your fascist propaganda, so I guess we pile on today's murder on top of the previous one, the earlier abduction you still refuse to acknowledge. That's how we know this asshole here knows he backed the wrong horse.

The aggressor marched on the US citizen and lunged, pinning him and the other to the ground, there is no legitimate confirmation of a counter attack from the US citizen who was released without charges if you'll recall which cuts against your fascist propaganda lie you swallowed so willingly. He was picked up again on video at a different store altogether from the crime scene injured after they released him without charges for your imagined punch, and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

Keep. Proving. Me. Right. Fascist. Apologist.

Why are you using videos from the 24th to argue your claim about something that happened previously to that?

[dot]

As predicted you can't pinpoint the "beating" you claim happened, so you change the subject, because there was no beating. If you want to talk about the other incident we can do that but I'm not letting you change the subject here because you can't admit that you got busted in a lie. Where specifically is the "beating" that you insist happened? What is the specific timestamp? Before we move on we need to finish here. Put up or shut up, bud.

No amount of bleating from you changes the fact that you deny the reality that's been presented in front of you. He was advanced upon, lunged at, pinned, detained, reemerged from custody injured and without charges for the punch you allege caused your phantom obstruction. At every step of the way, you've willingly ignored the facts of the incident, just like the previous murder, and just like the accompanying abduction example. And today's murder was presented as another example of the fact that you will refuse to acknowledge the fascism you're defending and apologizing for. Reading comprehension is tough when you operate solely in bad faith, huh? Keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

Why are you using videos from the 24th to argue your claim about something that happened previously to that?

and you'd know all this if you did the slightest amount of work to educate yourself instead of apologizing for fascists. But that would mean you'd have to operate in good faith, and we both know you don't do that since you are still ignoring the other example of unwarranted detainment for deportation of a US citizen and the unwarranted murder of a US citizen. Keep proving me right, fascist apologist, you already have your next opportunity to do so with some remarkable parallels. Go ahead and have at it unless this is another one you want to ignore, asshole.

Reading comprehension is tough when you operate solely in bad faith, huh?

[CHEEZY17]

This is what you said, retard:

Then you didn't watch the video of Bovino and goons marching into Target and beating the kid. Because that proved what I said,

YOU made the claim of video evidence of the employee getting beaten. You even presented a video as proof. When asked to show where, in your own video, that the beating happened you continually dodge and deflect. You dodge and deflect because you cannot prove your claim like you said you could. It's plain to see and the longer you go on deflecting and dodging the more ridiculous you look.
As I said, I'll be happy to converse with you about the next incident but I'm not letting you dodge out of your initial claim. Until you either admit you were wrong about the "beating" or can show the video evidence you claim existed we're going to remain on this one. Your choice, bud.

[dot]

This is what you said, retard:

Then you didn't watch the video of Bovino and goons marching into Target and beating the kid. Because that proved what I said,

YOU made the claim of video evidence of the employee getting beaten.

Don't blame me that you refuse to put 2 and 2 together. Bad faith fascist apologists get no room for being intentionally obtuse to allow for ignoring the evidence.

You even presented a video as proof. When asked to show where, in your own video, that the beating happened you continually dodge and deflect. You dodge and deflect because you cannot prove your claim like you said you could. It's plain to see and the longer you go on deflecting and dodging the more ridiculous you look.
As I said, I'll be happy to converse with you about the next incident but I'm not letting you dodge out of your initial claim. Until you either admit you were wrong about the "beating" or can show the video evidence you claim existed we're going to remain on this one. Your choice, bud.

Bitch, you've done nothing but dodge since the previous murder and the two abductions given as example here, one of which you still refuse to even address despite being introduced at the same time. You're not fooling anyone, you're hyper focusing on one to avoid defending the even more indefensible other incidents, and even this one you refuse to put together the picture of what happened. Through all provided posts that I put forth, nothing you looked up yourself except for the fascist propaganda line that you swallowed obediently, you can see the advance by the goons to the lunge by the point man with zero interference or obstruction by the US citizen to the pinning and unwarranted detaining by multiple goons to the US citizen released injured without charges afterwards in a different location which disproves your weak flimsy punch excuse. Only a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist would not be able to follow the timeline of events here, and not because you're not intellectually capable but because you refuse to be honest about the reality. So once again, keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

[Animal]

he was a male nurse. i'm beginning to see a pattern to these protestors.

[CHEEZY17]

This is what you said, retard:

Then you didn't watch the video of Bovino and goons marching into Target and beating the kid. Because that proved what I said,

YOU made the claim of video evidence of the employee getting beaten.

Don't blame me that you refuse to put 2 and 2 together. Bad faith fascist apologists get no room for being intentionally obtuse to allow for ignoring the evidence.

You even presented a video as proof. When asked to show where, in your own video, that the beating happened you continually dodge and deflect. You dodge and deflect because you cannot prove your claim like you said you could. It's plain to see and the longer you go on deflecting and dodging the more ridiculous you look.
As I said, I'll be happy to converse with you about the next incident but I'm not letting you dodge out of your initial claim. Until you either admit you were wrong about the "beating" or can show the video evidence you claim existed we're going to remain on this one. Your choice, bud.

Bitch, you've done nothing but dodge since the previous murder and the two abductions given as example here, one of which you still refuse to even address despite being introduced at the same time. You're not fooling anyone, you're hyper focusing on one to avoid defending the even more indefensible other incidents, and even this one you refuse to put together the picture of what happened. Through all provided posts that I put forth, nothing you looked up yourself except for the fascist propaganda line that you swallowed obediently, you can see the advance by the goons to the lunge by the point man with zero interference or obstruction by the US citizen to the pinning and unwarranted detaining by multiple goons to the US citizen released injured without charges afterwards in a different location which disproves your weak flimsy punch excuse. Only a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist would not be able to follow the timeline of events here, and not because you're not intellectually capable but because you refuse to be honest about the reality. So once again, keep proving me right, fascist apologist.

Dodgin' Dot living up to the name.
You made the claim. You couldn't back it up. You wrote the words; not me. I simply read the words that you wrote and incorrectly assumed that you meant them. Maybe you should look at your "evidence" and what it actually shows instead of lying about it.
As I said, I'll be happy to converse with you about the next incident but I'm not letting you dodge out of your initial claim. Until you either admit you were wrong about the "beating" or can show the video evidence you claim existed we're going to remain on this one. Your choice, bud.

[CHEEZY17]

he was a male nurse. i'm beginning to see a pattern to these protestors.

Teachers, nurses, poets...A huge percentage of these protestors have something in common. What could it be? Hmmmm
Know what we don't see? The Somalis or other minorities out there.

[Animal]

he was a male nurse. i'm beginning to see a pattern to these protestors.

Teachers, nurses, poets...A huge percentage of these protestors have something in common. What could it be? Hmmmm
Know what we don't see? The Somalis or other minorities out there.

I saw one of the male nurses best friends being interviewed. Let's just say that he was very "fancy".

[CHEEZY17]

[dot]

Dodgin' Dot living up to the name.

Zero acknowledgement of any of the facts from you yet again so you have to again make an accusation of what you yourself are doing. Not surprising from a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist.

You made the claim. You couldn't back it up.

Every bit of what I said took place and was documented. It's you that refuses to acknowledge it preferring instead the blatant lying fascist propaganda you swallowed whole. But that doesn't wipe it away from happening, it just exposes you as being a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist.

You wrote the words; not me. I simply read the words that you wrote and incorrectly assumed that you meant them. Maybe you should look at your "evidence" and what it actually shows instead of lying about it.

If you'd looked into the incident yourself like I did instead of taking the word of the fascists and their propaganda lies, then maybe you wouldn't be backing yet another wrong horse. But we both know you don't do that, because that's not what bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologists do. It's telling that you think because the marching into Target didn't happen in the initial headline video, that meant it didn't happen and you ran with it. Then when it was shown it did happen in a different video, you've dropped that defense and are now hyper focused on the US citizen's injuries simply because the cameras were not up in his face documenting the hits both on site and while in custody. The custody from which he was released without charges, which still cuts against your pitiful excuse of throwing a punch at an aggressor fascist goon that lunged at an innocent American citizen. So again, try doing your own research and maybe you won't keep making a fool of yourself by actively arguing against the facts established. Or don't, cause it's super easy to make you look the fool with this approach you take.

As I said, I'll be happy to converse with you about the next incident but I'm not letting you dodge out of your initial claim. Until you either admit you were wrong about the "beating" or can show the video evidence you claim existed we're going to remain on this one. Your choice, bud.

Correction: you won't address this new murder, or the other woman's abduction already disclosed at the same time as the Target post because you know you have no leg to stand on with any of them. Because you know you're wrong, just like you proved with the previous murder, so you are stubbornly refusing to admit to the facts presented in front of you in hopes it goes away so you can pretend it never happened. And that is what makes you a bad faith traitorous partisan hack fascist apologist, asshole. Keep proving me right.