So, was it a lab leak or nah?

[Charliesheen]

I suppose it’s possible a virus could construct itself exactly like it was modified in a lab. There’s a first time for everything.

[spudoc]

I suppose it’s possible a virus could construct itself exactly like it was modified in a lab. There’s a first time for everything.

Lay out your case that this was a human created virus.

[Biker]

I suppose it’s possible a virus could construct itself exactly like it was modified in a lab. There’s a first time for everything.

Lay out your case that this was a human created virus.

The genome sequence literally violates the laws of physics by having four amino acid parts having a positive charge. The original corona virus did indeed come from a bat but it was then spliced and engineered.

[Biker]

It’s really astonishing to watch these progressives contort themselves to defend the original narrative, all because their big bad orange man will be proven correct. Almost as if they can give a rats ass about the science they claim to support

[Charliesheen]

Never said human created. But modified in ways that don’t replicate natural evolution.

I posted the paper. It was very specific in comparing natural vs lab origins. The leap of faith one needs to execute to believe the outer structure isn’t man-made is wide.

[Charliesheen]

Why is it the left has to side with our enemies, over and over.

What’s the payoff for protecting the Chi-comma?

[Biker]

Why is it the left has to side with our enemies, over and over.

What’s the payoff for protecting the Chi-comma?

The left likes the way we’ve become similar to the CCP, with official, govt approved facts that are defended by the press. Remember when the socials were criticized by leftists when they bowed to China and created censors within China? Now they literally applaud the same exact thing here in the US. It’s treasonous and frankly more dangerous to our democracy than a riot with zip ties and Buffalo horns

[Stapes]

I suppose it’s possible a virus could construct itself exactly like it was modified in a lab. There’s a first time for everything.

Lay out your case that this was a human created virus.

The genome sequence literally violates the laws of physics by having four amino acid parts having a positive charge. The original corona virus did indeed come from a bat but it was then spliced and engineered.

Just swallowing any bullshit that comes your way as long as it backs your biases.... No further research is needed to see what you are reading is actually credible.? So far as I can tell this "research" is scetchy at best. Your an ignorant fool who is constantly duped by internet frauds.


https://www.sciencealert.com/the-lab-le ... -it-likely

[Stapes]

[Charliesheen]

Keep swinging, comrade. That’s not the only marker signifying lab engineering.

[Cassandros]

Other than the fact that this information goes against the comfortable narrative you've put so much faith and emotional investment into already...

Is there a logical reason to ignore this data?

[Biker]

Good cuck

https://nypost.com/2021/05/29/explosive ... ted-covid/

[Biker]

Keep swinging, comrade. That’s not the only marker signifying lab engineering.

Of course. In fact, the more evidence stacks up, the more insane you would have to be to accept that it came naturally, with the only evidence you can cite is that China and Fauci said so. These progressive cunts are traitors

Fuck, even our good professor has bailed and ran for hills from this thread.

[spudoc]

Other than the fact that this information goes against the comfortable narrative you've put so much faith and emotional investment into already...

Is there a logical reason to ignore this data?

If you read the rest of the article that Stapes posted there is a clear logical reason to ignore the data. The claim that it is impossible to have 4 positive charged amino acids in a row is false.

[Cassandros]

Other than the fact that this information goes against the comfortable narrative you've put so much faith and emotional investment into already...

Is there a logical reason to ignore this data?

If you read the rest of the article that Stapes posted there is a clear logical reason to ignore the data. The claim that it is impossible to have 4 positive charged amino acids in a row is false.

To "ignore the data".

There's your first problem.

You are so full of stage one (denial) you are willing to find any reason to "ignore the data" and call it "good".

Like I told you before, its going to be rough for you over the next few weeks, lots of denial, anger, bargaining... but if you are honest with yourself, and you stop accepting cherry picked data, you will make through the process and accept that you were betrayed by those you blindly trusted.

[spudoc]

Other than the fact that this information goes against the comfortable narrative you've put so much faith and emotional investment into already...

Is there a logical reason to ignore this data?

If you read the rest of the article that Stapes posted there is a clear logical reason to ignore the data. The claim that it is impossible to have 4 positive charged amino acids in a row is false.

To "ignore the data".

There's your first problem.

You are so full of stage one (denial) you are willing to find any reason to "ignore the data" and call it "good".

Like I told you before, its going to be rough for you over the next few weeks, lots of denial, anger, bargaining... but if you are honest with yourself, and you stop accepting cherry picked data, you will make through the process and accept that you were betrayed by those you blindly trusted.

i would say that in the end you will be proven wrong yet again and be crushed but you are a conspiracy nut and no amount of evidence will ever convince you otherwise.

[Cassandros]

Other than the fact that this information goes against the comfortable narrative you've put so much faith and emotional investment into already...

Is there a logical reason to ignore this data?

If you read the rest of the article that Stapes posted there is a clear logical reason to ignore the data. The claim that it is impossible to have 4 positive charged amino acids in a row is false.

To "ignore the data".

There's your first problem.

You are so full of stage one (denial) you are willing to find any reason to "ignore the data" and call it "good".

Like I told you before, its going to be rough for you over the next few weeks, lots of denial, anger, bargaining... but if you are honest with yourself, and you stop accepting cherry picked data, you will make through the process and accept that you were betrayed by those you blindly trusted.

i would say that in the end you will be proven wrong yet again and be crushed but you are a conspiracy nut and no amount of evidence will ever convince you otherwise.

Oh, the irony of you simultaneously "ignoring data" and calling me the "conspiracy nut".

LOL!!!

Does lashing out at me make you feel better, kiddo?
--> Too bad it doesn't impact the facts that have come out that show lab involvement is highly probable.

[Charliesheen]

The direct-from-bats thesis is a chimera between the natural emergence and lab escape scenarios. It’s a possibility that can’t be dismissed. But against it are the facts that 1) both SARS2 and RaTG13 seem to have only feeble affinity for bat cells, so one can’t be fully confident that either ever saw the inside of a bat; and 2) the theory is no better than the natural emergence scenario at explaining how SARS2 gained its furin cleavage site, or why the furin cleavage site is determined by human-preferred arginine codons instead of by the bat-preferred codons.

From the piece I posted last week.

[CHEEZY17]

Imagine the internal struggle the Lefties are dealing with.
They are trapped in a corner because to admit the virus could be from a lab means having to admit Trump was right.

[Who]

Y’all should get government jobs, from a few emails ya got this thing figured out. Congrats

[Animal]

Do some research you insufferable moron. This is an absolute nothing burger.

i asked you a simple question, you fucking retard. do YOU think it at all odd that Fauci was getting emails about a coronavirus bioweapon? If you don't just fucking say it.

He got an e-mail from a conspiracy nut. It’s not like the guy is a colleague of Fauci’s. He’s a self titled “independent researcher” who has no credentials.

ah. okay, that makes sense. thanks.

[spudoc]

Imagine the internal struggle the Lefties are dealing with.
They are trapped in a corner because to admit the virus could be from a lab means having to admit Trump was right.

When you say “from a lab” do you mean escaped from a lab or was created in a lab?

[CHEEZY17]

Imagine the internal struggle the Lefties are dealing with.
They are trapped in a corner because to admit the virus could be from a lab means having to admit Trump was right.

When you say “from a lab” do you mean escaped from a lab or was created in a lab?

At this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.

[Biker]

Imagine the internal struggle the Lefties are dealing with.
They are trapped in a corner because to admit the virus could be from a lab means having to admit Trump was right.

When you say “from a lab” do you mean escaped from a lab or was created in a lab?

At this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.

50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said so

[spudoc]

Imagine the internal struggle the Lefties are dealing with.
They are trapped in a corner because to admit the virus could be from a lab means having to admit Trump was right.

When you say “from a lab” do you mean escaped from a lab or was created in a lab?

At this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.

50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said so

Stop acting like you understand any of the science.You’ve proven many times over you are no where near that intelligent. You’re just repeating talking points that you found on your favorite conservative news sources.