Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:49 pm
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
The Republicans here are like goldfish, they return to the same fallacies over and over againFSchmertz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:49 pmWatch out, he might bring up the Southern Democrats vs Lincoln Republicans, without mentioning they're all turned into, and recruited as, "modern" Republicans now.
You realize that's not what I'm laughing about?spudoc wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 8:25 pmYou realize that is a news story and not Stapes prediction?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 8:22 pmlolStapes wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:44 pm The whole cadet class will be fired.
https://www.wsaz.com/content/news/Inves ... 40332.html
Ok
Thats what you're saying.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:39 pmBOTH SIDES!!!!!Antknot wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:22 pmOk, come up with a viable method to prove how every one of those in the picture votes and I’ll concede. Problem is you can’t and the whole thing is conjecture on the OP end that all, most, some, or any are Republicans. Being that was WVa I’m betting 50!50 no worse than 75!25.
LolFSchmertz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:49 pmWatch out, he might bring up the Southern Democrats vs Lincoln Republicans, without mentioning they've all turned into, and recruited as, "modern" Republicans now.
So do democrats. Plus they're racist.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:51 pmThe Republicans here are like goldfish, they return to the same fallacies over and over againFSchmertz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:49 pmWatch out, he might bring up the Southern Democrats vs Lincoln Republicans, without mentioning they're all turned into, and recruited as, "modern" Republicans now.
Nixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Can you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Does it really matter?VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pmCan you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Sure, but that flies in the face of the racist repukes thing. And I know of plenty of racist Democrats. It all depends on who you’re racist against?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:37 pmDoes it really matter?VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pmCan you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Whenever they show maps of which States vote for which party, the South is Pure Red. And no one disputes the Democrats owned it in the past, when they were the "Non-Lincoln Party." Now the Republicans own it, which means the South went from solid majority Democrat to solid majority Republican.
And no, that doesn't just mean the "Racist Democrats" became the "Racist Republicans". It's not that simple. Some Dixiecrats also saw the Democrats as too liberal and insufficiently "their flavor" of Christian. But a certain amount (variable from person to person) of old-fashioned racism factored into the decisions to eventually switch parties too.
I know very few democrats that aren't racist, usually they don't know it.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:43 pmSure, but that flies in the face of the racist repukes thing. And I know of plenty of racist Democrats. It all depends on who you’re racist against?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:37 pmDoes it really matter?VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pmCan you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Whenever they show maps of which States vote for which party, the South is Pure Red. And no one disputes the Democrats owned it in the past, when they were the "Non-Lincoln Party." Now the Republicans own it, which means the South went from solid majority Democrat to solid majority Republican.
And no, that doesn't just mean the "Racist Democrats" became the "Racist Republicans". It's not that simple. Some Dixiecrats also saw the Democrats as too liberal and insufficiently "their flavor" of Christian. But a certain amount (variable from person to person) of old-fashioned racism factored into the decisions to eventually switch parties too.
Kinda the truth for everyone.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 8:42 pmI know very few democrats that aren't racist, usually they don't know it.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:43 pmSure, but that flies in the face of the racist repukes thing. And I know of plenty of racist Democrats. It all depends on who you’re racist against?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:37 pmDoes it really matter?VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pmCan you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Whenever they show maps of which States vote for which party, the South is Pure Red. And no one disputes the Democrats owned it in the past, when they were the "Non-Lincoln Party." Now the Republicans own it, which means the South went from solid majority Democrat to solid majority Republican.
And no, that doesn't just mean the "Racist Democrats" became the "Racist Republicans". It's not that simple. Some Dixiecrats also saw the Democrats as too liberal and insufficiently "their flavor" of Christian. But a certain amount (variable from person to person) of old-fashioned racism factored into the decisions to eventually switch parties too.
And thus RINO's were born.FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:37 pmDoes it really matter?VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pmCan you tell me the percentage of racist democrats who left the party to join the republicans?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:18 pmNixon's "Silent Majority." They knew who they were jumping in bed with.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:29 pm lol @ the idea that all racist Democrats left the Democrat party in the 60's.
Lyndon Johnson knew he was kissing away a good part of his party in the South when he pushed the Civil Rights Act.
The Republicans were just fine with grabbing those Dixiecrats right away.
Whenever they show maps of which States vote for which party, the South is Pure Red. And no one disputes the Democrats owned it in the past, when they were the "Non-Lincoln Party." Now the Republicans own it, which means the South went from solid majority Democrat to solid majority Republican.
And no, that doesn't just mean the "Racist Democrats" became the "Racist Republicans". It's not that simple. Some Dixiecrats also saw the Democrats as too liberal and insufficiently "their flavor" of Christian. But a certain amount (variable from person to person) of old-fashioned racism factored into the decisions to eventually switch parties too.
Under no circumstance is violence against someone with opposing political views acceptable," Merwin said.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:35 am A Republican lawmaker in Montana claims the Constitution calls for socialists to be shot and jailed
Montana stage legislator is facing backlash after claiming that the Constitution calls for socialists to be shot and jailed.
State Rep. Rodney Garcia, who represents the Billings area, asked an unprompted question after a speech by former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke at a state Republican Party gathering Saturday, according to the Billings Gazette.
In his question, Garcia raised his concerns about socialists "entering our government" and claimed that they were "everywhere" in Billings. According to the lawmaker, the Constitution says socialists should be either shot or jailed. (It does not.)
After Zinke replied by saying, "Montana's a great state," Garcia reiterated: "We have to do something."
Speaking to a reporter on Saturday, Garcia explained that he believes "in the Constitution of the United States (if) they are found guilty of being a socialist member you either go to prison or are shot." However, Garcia was unable to point to the particular section of the Constitution he was referencing.
He later added, "I agree with my Constitution. That's what makes us free. We're not a democracy. We're a Republic Constitution."
Spenser Merwin, the executive director of the Montana Republican Party, said in a statement that his state's party condemns Garcia's remarks.
"Under no circumstance is violence against someone with opposing political views acceptable," Merwin said. "It's disappointing that this isolated incident took away from the weekend's events which showcased the strength of our statewide candidates and the importance of the upcoming election."
The United States Constitution was created in 1787 and ratified one year later. Though socialistic ideas can be traced as far back as antiquity, the modern conception of socialism began with the French Revolution in 1789, evolved through various less successful iterations during the early 19th Century and became the Marxist ideology widely associated with the term "socialism" today when "The Communist Manifesto" was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848.
"These days it's hard to say where political analysis ends and psychoanalysis begins," Norman Solomon, co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org and a Sanders delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention, told Salon by email. "Garcia is clearly unhinged."
"At the same time, the fact that Zinke responded only by praising the state of Montana — rather than condemning what he'd just heard — tells you much more about the current realities of the Republican Party than Garcia's comment does," he added. "The wink-nod approach that Trump pioneered during the 2016 campaign, galvanizing support and praise from a swath of avowed racists, as well as a much broader swath of people with right-wing inclinations, cleared a path and foreshadowed the grim terrain of current U.S. politics.
https://www.salon.com/2020/02/03/a-repu ... nd-jailed/
Though that's not exactly what's being said, I will admit it wasn't "exactly" violence. But "wink wink" we know the truth.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:53 pm The only violence against Limbaugh, the man who denied a link between tobacco and cancer, and killed people by promoting snake oil as a cancer cure, has come from the little baby Jesus, who has now layeth the smack down. Saying fuck him and good riddance isn't actually violence.
Of course you do. Your purposeful obtuseness is adorable. And totally see through, but adorable.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:44 pm No idea what you mean and you aren't capable of communication, so I guess it will just have to remain a mystery.
If you can't behave well after watching tv, you shouldn't watch tv.
I'm flattered, but for that to stick there has to be some troof to it. I cut my cable at least 2 years ago. My only exposure to Fox now is your loopy left references to it.