Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:57 pm
I know right
UJRefugees.net
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
More Violent Republicans
Page 10 of 28
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:06 pm
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pm
Are you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:06 pmI know right
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:13 pm
Oh, you too. Nevermind.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pmAre you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:06 pmI know right
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:21 pm
You didn't answer the question.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:13 pmOh, you too. Nevermind.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pmAre you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:06 pmI know right
So here's another one: If Politifact says a Democrat told a lie... is Politifact still left wing racist propaganda?
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:24 pm
I did answer the question. You missed it. Like really missed it.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:21 pmYou didn't answer the question.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:13 pmOh, you too. Nevermind.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pmAre you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:06 pmI know right
So here's another one: If Politifact says a Democrat told a lie... is Politifact still left wing racist propaganda?
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:30 pm
Sorry, but "Oh, you too. Nevermind" doesn't cut the mustard. You'll need to do better.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:24 pmI did answer the question. You missed it. Like really missed it.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:21 pmYou didn't answer the question.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:13 pmOh, you too. Nevermind.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pmAre you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?
So here's another one: If Politifact says a Democrat told a lie... is Politifact still left wing racist propaganda?
And you didn't answer the second question either.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:48 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:30 pmSorry, but "Oh, you too. Nevermind" doesn't cut the mustard. You'll need to do better.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:24 pmI did answer the question. You missed it. Like really missed it.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:21 pmYou didn't answer the question.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:13 pmOh, you too. Nevermind.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:12 pmAre you referring to the Politifact that has won a Pulitzer prize and up until a year ago was owned by the Tampa Bay Times that has won 12 Pulitzer prizes?
So here's another one: If Politifact says a Democrat told a lie... is Politifact still left wing racist propaganda?
And you didn't answer the second question either.
TRUMP 5016!
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:10 pm
It's weird how much foreigners are obsessed with you.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:14 pm
foreigners? get a rope!
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:16 pm
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pm
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:44 pm
I didn't dodge them.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pmI asked him 2 questions (he dodged both). I wouldn't call that an obsession.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:54 pm
You are literally on the record dodging them one page back. No point bothering to pursue for answers though, I proved you can't provide any and stickied the proof at the top of the forum.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:56 pm
You typed words... but you didn't answer either of the questions. There's a difference.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:44 pmI didn't dodge them.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pmI asked him 2 questions (he dodged both). I wouldn't call that an obsession.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:57 pm
I was trolling AH, you fell for it, that's not dodging.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:56 pmYou typed words... but you didn't answer either of the questions. There's a difference.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:44 pmI didn't dodge them.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pmI asked him 2 questions (he dodged both). I wouldn't call that an obsession.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:00 pm
OMG... you're WTC on steroids.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:57 pmI was trolling AH, you fell for it, that's not dodging.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:56 pmYou typed words... but you didn't answer either of the questions. There's a difference.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:44 pmI didn't dodge them.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pmI asked him 2 questions (he dodged both). I wouldn't call that an obsession.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:03 pm
Just because you can't see it the obvious is not my fault. I literally said Trump 2040. How can you not see the obvious. Don't become an AH. You're way better than that.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:00 pmOMG... you're WTC on steroids.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:57 pmI was trolling AH, you fell for it, that's not dodging.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:56 pmYou typed words... but you didn't answer either of the questions. There's a difference.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:44 pmI didn't dodge them.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pmI asked him 2 questions (he dodged both). I wouldn't call that an obsession.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:13 pm
As well as fitting the thread title, it also shows why the electoral college is a farce and should be abolished.
There were three EC voters in Texas that didn't want to vote for Trump. All got death threats and police protection, 2 switched and voted for him, and 1 stepped down letting the guy following him vote for Trump. The checks of the EC didn't work because people were scared for their families.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/522780/
There were three EC voters in Texas that didn't want to vote for Trump. All got death threats and police protection, 2 switched and voted for him, and 1 stepped down letting the guy following him vote for Trump. The checks of the EC didn't work because people were scared for their families.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/522780/
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:08 pm
Ilhan Omar challenger permanently suspended from Twitter after tweets about lynching congresswoman
Danielle Stella, a Republican seeking to unseat Rep. Ilhan Omar, Minnesota Democrat, was suspended from Twitter after her account posted Tuesday about lynching the congresswoman.
Ms. Stella’s campaign account on Twitter, @2020MNCongress, was punted from the platform after posting at least twice about hanging Ms. Omar, a progressive freshman frequently the target of right-wing attacks.
Each tweet involved an accusation recently amplified by Ms. Omar’s opponents that alleges she shared sensitive information with the Iranian government — a claim the congresswoman has since rejected as “outlandishly absurd.”
“If it is proven @IlhanMN passed sensitive info to Iran, she should be tried for #treason and hanged,” Ms. Stella’s campaign account said in the first tweet.
Ms. Stella’s campaign account subsequently tweeted the link to an article that aggregated her remark, accompanied by a crude depiction of a stick figure hanging from gallows.
The account has since been permanently suspended for repeated violations of Twitter’s rules, a Twitter spokesperson told The Washington Times on Wednesday.
“My suspension for advocating for the enforcement of federal code proves Twitter will always side with and fight to protect terrorists, traitors, pedophiles and rapists,” Ms. Stella told The Times when reached for comment.
Reacting on Twitter late Tuesday to the accusation spread by Ms. Stella and others, Ms. Omar said it was among the “misinformation and conspiracy theories” that have been regular for the congresswoman since taking office.
“The stories keep getting outlandishly absurd, and this latest one is no exception!” Ms. Omar tweeted. “People often ask me why I don’t fight back against them often. It’s a valid question, one my team, family and I struggle with. There is just too much, they are too ridiculous and it feel degrading to respond to such stupidity.”
“Also, who has time fact checking this insanity,” Ms. Omar tweeted.
At least five candidates, including Ms. Stella, are currently seeking the Republican nomination to run in 2020 against Ms. Omar. The state’s GOP primary election is set for Aug. 11.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... 3uY6ZZWhTk
Danielle Stella, a Republican seeking to unseat Rep. Ilhan Omar, Minnesota Democrat, was suspended from Twitter after her account posted Tuesday about lynching the congresswoman.
Ms. Stella’s campaign account on Twitter, @2020MNCongress, was punted from the platform after posting at least twice about hanging Ms. Omar, a progressive freshman frequently the target of right-wing attacks.
Each tweet involved an accusation recently amplified by Ms. Omar’s opponents that alleges she shared sensitive information with the Iranian government — a claim the congresswoman has since rejected as “outlandishly absurd.”
“If it is proven @IlhanMN passed sensitive info to Iran, she should be tried for #treason and hanged,” Ms. Stella’s campaign account said in the first tweet.
Ms. Stella’s campaign account subsequently tweeted the link to an article that aggregated her remark, accompanied by a crude depiction of a stick figure hanging from gallows.
The account has since been permanently suspended for repeated violations of Twitter’s rules, a Twitter spokesperson told The Washington Times on Wednesday.
“My suspension for advocating for the enforcement of federal code proves Twitter will always side with and fight to protect terrorists, traitors, pedophiles and rapists,” Ms. Stella told The Times when reached for comment.
Reacting on Twitter late Tuesday to the accusation spread by Ms. Stella and others, Ms. Omar said it was among the “misinformation and conspiracy theories” that have been regular for the congresswoman since taking office.
“The stories keep getting outlandishly absurd, and this latest one is no exception!” Ms. Omar tweeted. “People often ask me why I don’t fight back against them often. It’s a valid question, one my team, family and I struggle with. There is just too much, they are too ridiculous and it feel degrading to respond to such stupidity.”
“Also, who has time fact checking this insanity,” Ms. Omar tweeted.
At least five candidates, including Ms. Stella, are currently seeking the Republican nomination to run in 2020 against Ms. Omar. The state’s GOP primary election is set for Aug. 11.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... 3uY6ZZWhTk
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:32 pm
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 1:56 pm
Well it definitely doesn't work if they vote the way they feel. That's not what it's meant to do.DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:13 pm As well as fitting the thread title, it also shows why the electoral college is a farce and should be abolished.
There were three EC voters in Texas that didn't want to vote for Trump. All got death threats and police protection, 2 switched and voted for him, and 1 stepped down letting the guy following him vote for Trump. The checks of the EC didn't work because people were scared for their families.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/522780/
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:02 pm
Its called "Tyranny of the majority" and the Electoral College prevents that.
Sorry, I dont think its in the best interest of our ENTIRE country for California, New York, Florida and Texas to be the only ones deciding our elections.
Sorry, I dont think its in the best interest of our ENTIRE country for California, New York, Florida and Texas to be the only ones deciding our elections.
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:22 pm
Do you feel that the tyranny of the minority is better? Is it right that one person from Wyoming has more say in a national election than ten people from Los Angeles?
Re: More Violent Republicans
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2019 5:19 pm