DeSantis gets huge endorsement

[Animal]

yum!!!

[Burn1dwn]

G-damn it.

Ron DeSantis Turns In Killer Performance Slashing Trump's Lead To 39 Points
https://babylonbee.com/news/ron-desanti ... -39-points

Casey must have made a killer casserole after his head to head with Newsom.

Eggplant Parmigiano, probably.

[saltydog]

"And in some liberal states, you have post-birth abortions"

What a clown. No wonder Cheezy loves him.

[saltydog]

Is this good news going into primary season?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/desantis- ... key-states

[CHEEZY17]

Is this good news going into primary season?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/desantis- ... key-states

No, it its an acknowledgement of reality. As I said in the other thread: sadly, at this point unless he keels over, Trump cant/wont be stopped. I think deep down DeSantis knows it but he kind of has to keep going. Hopefully in 4 years he tries again.

[CHEEZY17]

I hate to say it as he gave it a good shot but my boy needs to give it up. Save and build his campaign war chest for 2028.
I'll still vote for him if hes on the ballot in the primary but this Trump train aint stopping.

[dot]

And you'll vote for it again, called it.

[CHEEZY17]

And you'll vote for it again, called it.

What exactly did you call? My vote for DeSantis in the primary? Hes had my vote since he declared, retard.
And if it comes down to it in the general, as Ive already said numerous times over the past months, yes I'll vote for Trump if hes the nominee. You cant "call" something that has already been stated.

[dot]

Called that in the end, you'd still end up back on the same derailed train you started with. The one you insisted you weren't on, but had to begrudgingly admit you'd support in the end. Imagine being so embedded in an anti-democracy cult that you'd vote for a guy again that called to terminate the Constitution.

[CHEEZY17]

So you "called" something I said I would do numerous times. Got it.

[Animal]

So you "called" something I said I would do numerous times. Got it.

I am going to call that Dupey Dot says that "crimes are not equal to charges filed".

[dot]

So you "called" something I said I would do numerous times. Got it.

Before you said it.

The one you insisted you weren't on, but had to begrudgingly admit you'd support in the end.

[Animal]

So you "called" something I said I would do numerous times. Got it.

Before you said it.

The one you insisted you weren't on, but had to begrudgingly admit you'd support in the end.

^ More proof that Dot is a woman.

[CHEEZY17]

I think UJR has broke Dodgin' Dot.

[dot]

How do you figure? I'm stating the timeline of your reluctant admissions that when Desantis lost, you admitted you'd still back Trump over any other candidate that would retain democracy. Because at the time of you professing your love for Desantis, it was pointed out how far back your Trump train support went. How even after it derailed the country and you still hadn't learned your lesson, you'd still support him. These observations came before you admitted you'd still back him after Desantis lost and definitely before Desantis lost. But hey, not like dishonesty is anything new for you.

[Animal]

How do you figure? I'm stating the timeline of your reluctant admissions that when Desantis lost, you admitted you'd still back Trump over any other candidate that would retain democracy. Because at the time of you professing your love for Desantis, it was pointed out how far back your Trump train support went. How even after it derailed the country and you still hadn't learned your lesson, you'd still support him. These observations came before you admitted you'd still back him after Desantis lost and definitely before Desantis lost. But hey, not like dishonesty is anything new for you.

yes ma'am.

[CHEEZY17]

How do you figure? I'm stating the timeline of your reluctant admissions that when Desantis lost, you admitted you'd still back Trump over any other candidate that would retain democracy. Because at the time of you professing your love for Desantis, it was pointed out how far back your Trump train support went. How even after it derailed the country and you still hadn't learned your lesson, you'd still support him. These observations came before you admitted you'd still back him after Desantis lost and definitely before Desantis lost. But hey, not like dishonesty is anything new for you.

yes ma'am.

I do believe we broke Dot.
In Dot world:
Deleting entire passages of posts, ignoring multiple questions and anything that destroys his position means they dont exist or are irrelevant
After pages of facts being pointed out it means "no one wants to touch the facts" and restating something that has been previously said numerous times means he "called it".

[Animal]

How do you figure? I'm stating the timeline of your reluctant admissions that when Desantis lost, you admitted you'd still back Trump over any other candidate that would retain democracy. Because at the time of you professing your love for Desantis, it was pointed out how far back your Trump train support went. How even after it derailed the country and you still hadn't learned your lesson, you'd still support him. These observations came before you admitted you'd still back him after Desantis lost and definitely before Desantis lost. But hey, not like dishonesty is anything new for you.

yes ma'am.

I do believe we broke Dot.
In Dot world:
Deleting entire passages of posts, ignoring multiple questions and anything that destroys his position means they dont exist or are irrelevant
After pages of facts being pointed out it means "no one wants to touch the facts" and restating something that has been previously said numerous times means he "called it".

I almost think that he has some miniscule point within this definition that he can't wait for someone to try to dispute so that he can unleash his prepared statement. its really bizarre. he obviously knows that he is dead in the water trying to argue that there isn't even one prosecutor involved in any of the hundreds and hundreds of cases that think he is right.

[dot]

So y'all's solution to proving me wrong is to never argue against what I say and change the subject? Got it, let me know how that works out.

[Antknot]

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy ... ump-report


DeSantis drops out of 2024 presidential race, endorses Trump

[Animal]

would he be jockeying for a VP job and the chance to take over if something like a guilty verdict messes things up? His endorsement of Trump didn't sound like that, he was more like "Look, I made a promise to endorse and I will honor my promise".

[CHEEZY17]

would he be jockeying for a VP job and the chance to take over if something like a guilty verdict messes things up? His endorsement of Trump didn't sound like that, he was more like "Look, I made a promise to endorse and I will honor my promise".

Damn it.
Yeah, I would love it if Donny chose him but man that seems like some bad blood there.
Rumor is Vivek is the leading possibility.

[peterosehaircut]

would he be jockeying for a VP job and the chance to take over if something like a guilty verdict messes things up? His endorsement of Trump didn't sound like that, he was more like "Look, I made a promise to endorse and I will honor my promise".

Damn it.
Yeah, I would love it if Donny chose him but man that seems like some bad blood there.
Rumor is Vivek is the leading possibility.

https://politics.stackexchange.com/ques ... ame-states

According to the 12th amendment the president and vp can't be from the same state.

[Animal]

would he be jockeying for a VP job and the chance to take over if something like a guilty verdict messes things up? His endorsement of Trump didn't sound like that, he was more like "Look, I made a promise to endorse and I will honor my promise".

Damn it.
Yeah, I would love it if Donny chose him but man that seems like some bad blood there.
Rumor is Vivek is the leading possibility.

https://politics.stackexchange.com/ques ... ame-states

According to the 12th amendment the president and vp can't be from the same state.

While interesting, that's not what the 12th amendment means. It means that (in the case of Trump/Desnatis) electors in FLORIDA couldn't vote for both Trump as President and Desantis as VP. They would have to vote Trump as President and then someone else as VP, which wouldn't matter because the rest of the country could vote for both of them without conflict.

Its only the electoral college voters that cannot vote for a Pres and VP that reside in the same state as the electoral college voter.

[Biker]

would he be jockeying for a VP job and the chance to take over if something like a guilty verdict messes things up? His endorsement of Trump didn't sound like that, he was more like "Look, I made a promise to endorse and I will honor my promise".

Damn it.
Yeah, I would love it if Donny chose him but man that seems like some bad blood there.
Rumor is Vivek is the leading possibility.

https://politics.stackexchange.com/ques ... ame-states

According to the 12th amendment the president and vp can't be from the same state.

Interesting. I had no idea that was a thing