UJRefugees.net

The lawsuit lists two other defendants: the dog’s owner, Michelle Brannan, and Alaska Airlines. The suit claims Brannan should have known that her dog had “vicious propensities.” The suit says the airline is at fault for allegedly allowing Brannan to bring a dangerous dog into the gate waiting area, where the attack happened, when the dog wasn’t a trained service animal and wasn’t properly confined.

With Brannan’s consent, Gabriella began petting the dog, Stavley said. It then bit her -- puncturing her eyelid, severing her tear duct, lacerating her face and tearing her lip, Stavley said. The girl underwent surgery and has visible scars today, he said.

Biker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:53 pm This is more about the bullshit scam of service and therapy animals. Airlines are finally calling bullshit on it

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:44 pm The Canadian province of Ontario banned all Pitbulls back in 2005.
Can't recall the last time I saw one.

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:55 pm

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:44 pm The Canadian province of Ontario banned all Pitbulls back in 2005.
Can't recall the last time I saw one.

The problem isn't even the dogs. It's the idiots at the airlines that were convinced that "support animals" was a good idea. Hell, bring a rattlesnake. Totally lunacy. If you can't travel outside your home without a support animal, it's probably a good idea to never leave it.