UJRefugees.net

After all the lawsuits, recounts, tossed ballots and whining, whom will be sworn in as President in January?

Multiple options and you can change your picks at any time including next May.

I picked Pelosi because I think Trump and his lawyers won't give up.

Biker, good news you're killing leftneck

Not sure but I recall an AV bet with AH. I mean really. What’s the worst that can happen if Trump wins?

The SC only hears what’s thrown in front of it. So if Cap’n knocks up another married gal since he can’t pull a single one, she’ll have to go to DC, where abortions are so common you get airline miles when you pay for them.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:19 am Not sure but I recall an AV bet with AH. I mean really. What’s the worst that can happen if Trump wins?

The SC only hears what’s thrown in front of it. So if Cap’n knocks up another married gal since he can’t pull a single one, she’ll have to go to DC, where abortions are so common you get airline miles when you pay for them.

Each SC justice decides whether or not to take a case based on the submission of a writ of certiorari. If four of the nine agree with the writ, the SC takes the case. They get so many a year, and the vast majority of writs are passed by, and often by the justices' law clerks rather than the justices themselves.

The SC "only hears what's thrown in front of it" by those writs. A more conservative (or liberal) court may decide to agree to take on a writ and its case based on the vote of those justices who want to hear it. That's the idea behind keeping a more balanced court, neither side would be able to take cases it might not have ordinarily.

Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

If the black President was Obama, he DID select someone in his final year. Remember?

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:01 pm The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

Ooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrr....... maybe the Senate was the ONLY one doing their Constitutional Duty. I mean, unless you want a country where we start impeaching people over phone calls and stuff.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:01 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm Got it.

Can you point me to where in the constitution it speaks to the court being balanced.

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

Wrong again, no requirement for Senate to call witnesses or evidence. The Democrats failed to prove their assertion.
Did I mention this lost them voters?

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:09 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:01 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:45 pm

Can you point me to where in the constitution where it says a black President cannot select a nominee in his final year of holding office? Can you point me to where in the constitution it says there are to be 9 Justices?

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

Wrong again, no requirement for Senate to call witnesses or evidence. The Democrats failed to prove their assertion.
Did I mention this lost them voters?

The Democrats didn't get a chance as no witnesses or new evidence were allowed to be admitted, The GOP Senate again did not do what Americans paid them to do. They declined to do the work they are paid to do.

The Democrats lost no voters, you traitors are losing badly and you know it.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:15 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:09 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:01 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:47 pm

Obama wasn't prevented from nominating a candidate. The candidate was rejected without a hearing.

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

Wrong again, no requirement for Senate to call witnesses or evidence. The Democrats failed to prove their assertion.
Did I mention this lost them voters?

The Democrats didn't get a chance as no witnesses or new evidence were allowed to be admitted, The GOP Senate again did not do what Americans paid them to do. They declined to do the work they are paid to do.

Wrong once again. Willfully ignorant, or just unwilling to admit you are wrong?

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:22 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:15 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:09 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:01 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:49 pm

So The Senate failed to do its Constitutional duty?

Rejected the candidate. Job done. Obvious he would not get the ok, why waste time. Unlike the democrat run house that ran a scam FAILED impeachment, wasting time, money, political capitol, and losing voters.

The impeachment was successful. President Trump was impeached. The Senate called no witnesses and heard no evidence. Again The GOP Senate was derelict in their Constitutional Duty.

Wrong again, no requirement for Senate to call witnesses or evidence. The Democrats failed to prove their assertion.
Did I mention this lost them voters?

The Democrats didn't get a chance as no witnesses or new evidence were allowed to be admitted, The GOP Senate again did not do what Americans paid them to do. They declined to do the work they are paid to do.

Wrong once again. Willfully ignorant, or just unwilling to admit you are wrong?

The Senate GOP DID NOT DO THEIR DUTY. YOU ARE A TREASONOUS FUCKSTICK. They allowed the Supreme Court to sit at 8 justices for over a year. When the Democrats expand the court and remove Trumps only accomplishment I will laugh at all of you for throwing away your entire party for nothing.

poor little CaptQueef. The great defender of the party of Nancy Pelosi, AOC and Chlamydia Harris.

The Victorious party

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:17 pm The Democrats lost no voters, you traitors are losing badly and you know it.

Ummm...... youre not hearing what I am

Florida Mail-in Ballots Already Eclipse Entire August Primary, With Dems Casting More Than Republicans

https://www.newsweek.com/florida-mail-b ... ns-1540035

I heard a news cast last night on local news. they were doing a story on the "explosion" of early voters this year. They showed the totals of each day in Tarrant County in the last 4 days. And the numbers, as they described, were just shocking they were so high. Almost 50,000 early voters EVERY single day in the first 4 days. New Records! THey interviewed the guy in charge of early voting in Tarrant County and he was just glowing with the reviews of how his people were handling the "onslaught" of early voters. Compared to other years this was just breath taking. Then the reporter said that, "when you compare JUST these last 4 days to the first 4 days in 2016, we have seen nearly 10,000 more early votes this year! Its amazing".

When you do the math on 50,000 votes per day for 4 days and have a 10,000 increase, that's 5% more this year than 2016. I think a 5% increase hardly merits that kind of news story.