UJRefugees.net

I didn't agree with her on stuff, but she dedicated her life to the country and worked her ass off. For that I salute her. RIP you damn left wing nutjob. You've earned it from a lifetime of dedication to your beleifs.

Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

I like a 4-4-1 court, which is what we had.

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

Got some bad news for you...

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

4 years is a long time to keep the seat vacant.

Mtb_man wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:43 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

4 years is a long time to keep the seat vacant.

My bad, I forgot to add the Moscow Mitch quote.

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

Sin,

Mitch McConnell

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Just one of many reasons he’ll be re-elected.

The confirmation process will be “must watch” and “must bitch about” tv.

Six-three can save the republic. Hallelujah!

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

And yet He was not outvoted, and actually humiliated Monica Lewinsky's ex-boyfriend's wife 306-232.

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

I like the nerve this touches with knuckle draggers.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:59 pm

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

It’s just another example of the lack of enthusiasm you keep harping about.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:59 pm

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

Here’s another example of the lack of enthusiasm in the Democrats side:

The 2018 midterm elections brought significant gains for Democrats, who retook the House of Representatives and snatched several governorships from the grip of Republicans.

Among the most eye-catching was a statistic showing Democrats led Republicans by more than 12 million votes in Senate races.

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

................................................

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:59 pm Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

Are you trying to argue that the election of the US president, arguably the most important elected position in our current world, is little better than a tennis competition?