UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
Based on results? Nike. Obviously.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:28 pm I've never in my entire life ever bought a single Nike product. I've never in my life ever entered a Starbucks. I have eaten at Chick-Fil-A a few times. Almost every time though, I go someplace else because the wait lines are out the door. Which business model would you want to bank on?
Was your lemonade over-priced?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:28 pm I've never in my entire life ever bought a single Nike product. I've never in my life ever entered a Starbucks. I have eaten at Chick-Fil-A a few times. Almost every time though, I go someplace else because the wait lines are out the door. Which business model would you want to bank on?
Yes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:51 pmI'm not sure you understand how publicly owned businesses operate.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:47 pmAbsolutely. The difference? They make sure that Corporate culture doesn't seep down into the business end. Contrast that with Nike, Starbucks where every $100 contribution to some progressive cause is met with a worldwide press release. Just business idiocy on how not to run a business.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:17 pmYeah, Nike isn't successful at all.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:15 pm Well, let's flip the tables and see how to run a business from the other side and correct. Conservative minded Chick-Fil-A. No doubt the owners, CEO, top officers contribute to Conservative causes. If you'll ncustomers. otice they do so quietly so is doesn't interfere with the business side. That is a solid business model. Nike couldn't contribute $100 for the Gay Scouts without a press release. Just dumb beyond belief.
Chick-Fil-A is privately owned. They don't have to worry about shareholders. BTW they took their share of heat about being anti gay.
Quit postulating.
You're pathetic and Sunday drunk.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:51 pmI'm not sure you understand how publicly owned businesses operate.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:47 pmAbsolutely. The difference? They make sure that Corporate culture doesn't seep down into the business end. Contrast that with Nike, Starbucks where every $100 contribution to some progressive cause is met with a worldwide press release. Just business idiocy on how not to run a business.
Quit postulating.
Nope. Just having funmegman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:43 pmYou're pathetic and Sunday drunk.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:51 pmI'm not sure you understand how publicly owned businesses operate.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:47 pm Absolutely. The difference? They make sure that Corporate culture doesn't seep down into the business end. Contrast that with Nike, Starbucks where every $100 contribution to some progressive cause is met with a worldwide press release. Just business idiocy on how not to run a business.
Quit postulating.
It's so easyMy math skills go beyond 2+2 so I'd probably lose you within the first 10 seconds, GED boy.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:51 pmI'm not sure you understand how publicly owned businesses operate.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:47 pmAbsolutely. The difference? They make sure that Corporate culture doesn't seep down into the business end. Contrast that with Nike, Starbucks where every $100 contribution to some progressive cause is met with a worldwide press release. Just business idiocy on how not to run a business.
Quit postulating.
Ya, dumb is just second nature for you. Have at it.....WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:52 pmNope. Just having funmegman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:43 pmYou're pathetic and Sunday drunk.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.
Quit postulating.
Crunch those economic math numbers Retard. 2 weeks with out hearing from you sounds like a good deal.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:03 pmMy math skills go beyond 2+2 so I'd probably lose you within the first 10 seconds, GED boy.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:51 pmI'm not sure you understand how publicly owned businesses operate.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:47 pm Absolutely. The difference? They make sure that Corporate culture doesn't seep down into the business end. Contrast that with Nike, Starbucks where every $100 contribution to some progressive cause is met with a worldwide press release. Just business idiocy on how not to run a business.
Quit postulating.
*withoutWestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:11 pmCrunch those economic math numbers Retard. 2 weeks with out hearing from you sounds like a good deal.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:03 pmMy math skills go beyond 2+2 so I'd probably lose you within the first 10 seconds, GED boy.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pmI'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.
Quit postulating.
Yep. Ive told Mrs. CHEEZY to not buy me or the kids anything Nike but I sure wouldnt mind a chunk of Nike stock long term.B-Tender wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:30 pmBased on results? Nike. Obviously.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:28 pm I've never in my entire life ever bought a single Nike product. I've never in my life ever entered a Starbucks. I have eaten at Chick-Fil-A a few times. Almost every time though, I go someplace else because the wait lines are out the door. Which business model would you want to bank on?
And yet you fail to see the big overall picture. Nobody gives a shit about some lame ass QB who soared for a couple of years until defenses figured him out, and made him mediocre. And Nike wants to run with that. OK.
Nobody gives a shit about some lame ass QB... but the stock is going up.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:02 amAnd yet you fail to see the big overall picture. Nobody gives a shit about some lame ass QB who soared for a couple of years until defenses figured him out, and made him mediocre. And Nike wants to run with that. OK.
I should order a pair of Air Monarchs post a pic for WTCReservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:18 amNike is up $3 Billion.
https://www.denverpost.com/2019/07/06/n ... nick-shoe/
WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:30 am And still makes shitty products I'll never buy while paying their Malaysian slave labors $2 a day while advocating $15/ hour for burger flippers at home. thus killing the local economies. I can assure. Nobody has looked at the Nike economic model for 2 decades.
** withootReservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:29 pm*withoutWestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:11 pmCrunch those economic math numbers Retard. 2 weeks with out hearing from you sounds like a good deal.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:03 pmMy math skills go beyond 2+2 so I'd probably lose you within the first 10 seconds, GED boy.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:41 pmYes, because companies just roll in the money no matter how bad they they treat their customers. Who's postulating this garbage crap and can we get RD in here to do some basic economic math equations on some arcane questions so he's tied up for a week or 2.megman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:09 pmPublicly owned companies answer to shareholders, customers be damned.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:04 pm I'm not sure you understand how businesses operate period. Rule #1- don't piss off the customers. Rule #2- do #1 and you won't have to worry about Rules much longer.
Quit postulating.