Page 209 of 212

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 4:08 am
by BigChiefin
CHEEZY17 wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 3:20 am Image
:lol:

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 4:15 am
by peterosehaircut
Oh fuck! :lol:

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:17 pm
by necronomous
Animal wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:04 pm I heard Newsom's remarks and he wasn't calling colored people dumb. he was just saying that he's not very smart.

I suspected that to be the case, but it would good to hear him confirm it. He said that he never reads a speech because he can't read.
It was the im just like you part is think. Whether his intention was to compare, he heavily implied it.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 3:56 pm
by Animal
necronomous wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:17 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:04 pm I heard Newsom's remarks and he wasn't calling colored people dumb. he was just saying that he's not very smart.

I suspected that to be the case, but it would good to hear him confirm it. He said that he never reads a speech because he can't read.
It was the im just like you part is think. Whether his intention was to compare, he heavily implied it.
yes, it was absolutely that part, but if you watched the interview in real time, it seemed as if he was making that statement rhetorically and not specifically to the black person sitting across from him. And rhetorically in general and not even to the specific audience that he was sitting in front of, which was not predominantly black. It looked to me like he was directing that comment to the amount of people that would score 960 or less on an SAT score in general. Statistically 41 percent of the test takers would score below 960 on an SAT. But that's 41 percent of the people that even take the test. Over 50 percent of high school seniors don't even take an SAT, meaning that the large majority of that pool probably know they can't score very well on the test so they don't bother.

For whatever reason he simply felt it was important to let people know that he's not very smart.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 7:31 pm
by BigChiefin
Animal wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 3:56 pm
necronomous wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:17 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:04 pm I heard Newsom's remarks and he wasn't calling colored people dumb. he was just saying that he's not very smart.

I suspected that to be the case, but it would good to hear him confirm it. He said that he never reads a speech because he can't read.
It was the im just like you part is think. Whether his intention was to compare, he heavily implied it.
yes, it was absolutely that part, but if you watched the interview in real time, it seemed as if he was making that statement rhetorically and not specifically to the black person sitting across from him. And rhetorically in general and not even to the specific audience that he was sitting in front of, which was not predominantly black. It looked to me like he was directing that comment to the amount of people that would score 960 or less on an SAT score in general. Statistically 41 percent of the test takers would score below 960 on an SAT. But that's 41 percent of the people that even take the test. Over 50 percent of high school seniors don't even take an SAT, meaning that the large majority of that pool probably know they can't score very well on the test so they don't bother.

For whatever reason he simply felt it was important to let people know that he's not very smart.
He's a two-faced charlatan who also brags on his podcast about all of the books he has read. He gives me sleazy used car salesman vibes. Anyone who would vote for this clown can't have a very high intelligence or is just blinded by partisanship.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2026 12:59 am
by CHEEZY17
BigChiefin wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 7:31 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 3:56 pm
necronomous wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:17 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:04 pm I heard Newsom's remarks and he wasn't calling colored people dumb. he was just saying that he's not very smart.

I suspected that to be the case, but it would good to hear him confirm it. He said that he never reads a speech because he can't read.
It was the im just like you part is think. Whether his intention was to compare, he heavily implied it.
yes, it was absolutely that part, but if you watched the interview in real time, it seemed as if he was making that statement rhetorically and not specifically to the black person sitting across from him. And rhetorically in general and not even to the specific audience that he was sitting in front of, which was not predominantly black. It looked to me like he was directing that comment to the amount of people that would score 960 or less on an SAT score in general. Statistically 41 percent of the test takers would score below 960 on an SAT. But that's 41 percent of the people that even take the test. Over 50 percent of high school seniors don't even take an SAT, meaning that the large majority of that pool probably know they can't score very well on the test so they don't bother.

For whatever reason he simply felt it was important to let people know that he's not very smart.
He's a two-faced charlatan who also brags on his podcast about all of the books he has read. He gives me sleazy used car salesman vibes. Anyone who would vote for this clown can't have a very high intelligence or is just blinded by partisanship.
So, your typical lefty?🤣

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2026 2:07 am
by BigChiefin
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 12:59 am
BigChiefin wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 7:31 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 3:56 pm
necronomous wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:17 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:04 pm I heard Newsom's remarks and he wasn't calling colored people dumb. he was just saying that he's not very smart.

I suspected that to be the case, but it would good to hear him confirm it. He said that he never reads a speech because he can't read.
It was the im just like you part is think. Whether his intention was to compare, he heavily implied it.
yes, it was absolutely that part, but if you watched the interview in real time, it seemed as if he was making that statement rhetorically and not specifically to the black person sitting across from him. And rhetorically in general and not even to the specific audience that he was sitting in front of, which was not predominantly black. It looked to me like he was directing that comment to the amount of people that would score 960 or less on an SAT score in general. Statistically 41 percent of the test takers would score below 960 on an SAT. But that's 41 percent of the people that even take the test. Over 50 percent of high school seniors don't even take an SAT, meaning that the large majority of that pool probably know they can't score very well on the test so they don't bother.

For whatever reason he simply felt it was important to let people know that he's not very smart.
He's a two-faced charlatan who also brags on his podcast about all of the books he has read. He gives me sleazy used car salesman vibes. Anyone who would vote for this clown can't have a very high intelligence or is just blinded by partisanship.
So, your typical lefty?🤣
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2026 8:26 pm
by Homebrew
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 8:43 pm
by Homebrew
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 9:17 pm
by Animal
holt cat doesn't sell anything that cheap.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:34 pm
by Biker
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:24 pm
by CHEEZY17
Iran Warns U.S. It Has Huge Stockpile Of Supreme Leaders
https://babylonbee.com/news/iran-warns- ... me-leaders

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 2:09 am
by CHEEZY17
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 12:40 pm
by BigChiefin
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Mar 12, 2026 2:09 am Image
It's a classic!

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 1:43 pm
by Biker

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2026 7:18 pm
by Homebrew
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 2:29 am
by CHEEZY17
Homebrew wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 7:18 pm Image
Anyone that's worked in a shop knows that this is fucking first class shop humor. :lol:

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 3:53 pm
by QillerDaemon
Without any real safety guards, my father's family lost at least one part of their hand due to power tools. They were into commercial construction and commercial boat building, and it was pretty much a badge of honor to be missing some small piece somewhere. Even my dad lost the tip of his right ring finger, and he wasn't really that involved in the sweat labor of the business.
Homebrew wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 7:18 pm Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2026 4:42 am
by nerd_alert
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2026 6:41 pm
by CHEEZY17
nerd_alert wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2026 4:42 am Image
There is about to be a LOT of hookers and blow in his future. :lol:

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2026 4:08 pm
by nerd_alert
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2026 12:53 am
by necronomous
nerd_alert wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2026 4:42 am Image
Its not, but he looks a lot like my father-in-law.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:36 pm
by Homebrew
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2026 1:08 am
by nerd_alert
Image

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:32 pm
by CHEEZY17