Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 6:45 pm
I guess lying to Congress is ok.
It was SOP during The Trump Admin
UJRefugees.net
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Page 14 of 15
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 6:58 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 10:54 pm
Unless China comes right out and says "Sorry, world. We fucked up." Nothing will be good enough for the capt/Stapes/hammy crowd.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 11:36 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 11:44 pm
I have no doubt some lab tech got himself exposed and set off the tsunami.......but you ain't ever going to prove it
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:40 am
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:42 am
What evidence dick face? There is more evidence and precedent that the virus evolved naturally. You're stroking your dick with "evidence"
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:45 am
It’s been listed here multiple times, cunt face.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:42 am
What evidence dick face? There is more evidence and precedent that the virus evolved naturally. You're stroking your dick with "evidence"
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:14 am
You've posted conjectures from nobodies.Biker wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:45 amIt’s been listed here multiple times, cunt face.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:42 am
What evidence dick face? There is more evidence and precedent that the virus evolved naturally. You're stroking your dick with "evidence"
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 2:40 am
We get it. Your side good other side bad.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:14 amYou've posted conjectures from people my side considers nobodies. You have to post conjectures from nobodies on my side. Your doctors are phonies and paid off, mine are real and are 100% immune to propaganda, bribery, and ideology. Also you're white.Biker wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:45 amIt’s been listed here multiple times, cunt face.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:42 am
What evidence dick face? There is more evidence and precedent that the virus evolved naturally. You're stroking your dick with "evidence"
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:28 pm
REVEALED: Daszak Admits Fauci Funded Chinese Coronavirus Research at Conference Featuring Hunter Biden-Linked Pandemic Group.
It may seem too convenient to be true, but this event actually happened in 2017. The full video follows the article.
[media]
https://rumble.com/vmt61x-daszak-2017.html[/media]
Speaking at the 2017 Consortium of Universities for Global Health conference on a panel alongside Anthony Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak admitted his controversial “work on coronaviruses in China” was carried out with “funding through” Fauci’s National Institutes of Health agency.
The unearthed conference follows Fauci’s repeated attempts to distance his agency from the controversial New York-based non-profit, which, as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant registry shows, used the money to collaborate with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The National Pulse has previously uncovered footage of Daszak describing the viruses he manipulated as part of his “longtime” collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party-run lab as “killers.”
The 2017 event, the “Healthy People, Healthy Ecosystems” conference hosted by the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH), took place in Washington, D.C. In its description of the conference, CUGH notes that the conference supports its vision for a “world without borders”:
The conference’s unearthed agenda reveals the attendance of EcoHealth President Peter Daszak, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci, and Principal Deputy Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Anne Schuchat. The three individuals participated in a panel – “Future of Infectious Disease Pandemics: From Ebola to Zika, and Beyond” – where they discussed pandemic preparedness.
“Although much is known about how to detect and respond to existing infections, more research is needed to predict the likelihood of their emergence and spread, and to improve the precision and timeliness of public health responsiveness,” notes the panel description.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 12:41 am
Jesus Christ 
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 3:16 am
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 12:33 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 12:46 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 1:38 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 4:56 pm
Whose side are they on????
Biden Administration Doles Out $250K to Wuhan Lab-Linked Group
EcoHealth Alliance's founder waged a secret campaign to disprove the lab-leak theory
The Biden administration awarded more than $250,000 to an organization whose founder waged a secret campaign last year to undercut the theory that the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab.
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency granted $253,279 to EcoHealth Alliance in July to conduct research to thwart the use of viruses as weapons of mass destruction. EcoHealth Alliance worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the lab that many U.S. officials believe was ground zero for the coronavirus outbreak. The group's founder, Peter Daszak, secretly organized a group of scientists early in the pandemic to publicly undermine the theory that the pandemic sprung from a leak at the Wuhan lab.
The U.S. intelligence community is divided on whether the virus came from the lab or naturally spilled over from animals to humans. One intelligence agency assessed with moderate confidence that an accident at the Wuhan lab resulted in the first coronavirus infection, according to a report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Four other intelligence agencies assessed with only low confidence that the first infection came through natural exposure. Though the lab-leak theory was widely dismissed in 2020, a growing number of scientists now say it is the most likely explanation for the outbreak.
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which operates within the Defense Department, has awarded $37 million to EcoHealth since 2013, though the July grant was the first given during the Biden administration. The Trump and Biden administrations have investigated whether the Chinese government covered up evidence of a 2019 lab accident at the Wuhan Institute that may have caused the pandemic. Republicans in Congress have called for investigations into EcoHealth Alliance’s relationship with the Wuhan Institute.
Daszak, a British-American zoologist, organized a group of scientists in February 2020 to sign a letter published in the Lancet, the prominent British medical journal, which cast doubt on the lab-leak theory, according to emails released last year. Undisclosed in the letter was that the EcoHealth Alliance had received grants from the U.S. government to conduct research at the Wuhan Institute. The EcoHealth Alliance gave $600,000 in grants to the Wuhan Institute between 2014 and 2019, the Daily Caller reported.
One watchdog group investigating the origins of the virus called on the government to cut its funding for EcoHealth Alliance, citing the group’s refusal to cooperate with congressional documents requests.
"Taking tax dollars appropriated by Congress and thumbing your nose at oversight investigations into the origins of COVID-19 is unacceptable," said Jason Foster, a former investigative counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee and founder of Empower Oversight.
"The government should stop funding those who refuse to be transparent about how they use the money," Foster told the Washington Free Beacon.
Daszak was the only American scientist on the World Health Organization team that investigated the origins of the virus in China earlier this year. While Daszak insisted the virus did not originate from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute, other scientists on the mission have acknowledged that Chinese authorities withheld information that would have aided the investigation.
Daszak’s opposition to the lab-leak theory has earned him praise from Chinese state-run news outlets. The scientist has appeared for multiple interviews with Beijing-controlled propaganda outlet CGTN.
The Defense Department and EcoHealth Alliance did not respond to requests for comment.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:00 pm
New Wuhan COVID docs 'completely contradict Fauci' on gain-of-function claims, ex-State Dept official says
Dr. David Asher said the 'lies' propagated by China and the U.S. NIH 'have now been defeated'.
Newly leaked documents obtained by private research group DRASTIC "completely contradict" claims made by both China and American immunologist Dr. Anthony S. Fauci about the reality of gain-of-function research being done inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have caused the coronavirus pandemic, according to a former State Department COVID-19 investigator.
On "The Story", host Martha MacCallum reported the documents released by DRASTIC revealed a plan to create a coronavirus – in this case SARS-CoV-2 – that would be more infections to and transmissible via humans. The virus would then be released in batcaves where researchers would test the flying mammals with vaccines to see if they could cure the virus.
The Chinese researchers planned to inject the "super-charged" virus into "humanized mice" to see what the effect on them would be.
Dr. David Asher, the ex-State Department official, told Fox News the biggest takeaway from the new documents is that there is a "smoking gun that explains the specific features of the [virus] sequence that are so peculiar."
"The most genetically unusual piece of the puzzle and the sequence is a 'furin cleavage site', which allows the virus to spread from bats to humans, and among humans in a highly pathogenic way," he said.
"The fact that the Wuhan Institute – with EcoHealth Alliance as their US partner – were applying for funding to do gain of function research, explicitly to endow a bat-borne Coronavirus related to SARS with a furin cleavage site so it could essentially kill humans."
EcoHealth alliance, a New York-based NGO, is run by Dr. Peter Daszak, whom Fox News host Tucker Carlson recently discussed on his program.
Carlson previously reported on Daszak's group's funding of bat coronavirus research in Wuhan, with the help of the taxpayer funding the federal government directed to EcoHealth Alliance.
"We learned that the guy directly tied to bat virus experiments in the lab in Wuhan was the same guy telling the entire world that there was no possibility this virus could have come from the Wuhan lab. Conflict of interest, anyone? It’s absurd," Carlson said of Daszak in June, noting that the doctor organized a letter published in The Lancet that downplayed the possibility the virus could've come from the Chinese lab.
On Thursday, Asher told Fox News he is relieved that in the end, DARPA, the Pentagon's research & development arm, turned down direct funding to the coronavirus project in the Wuhan lab on account of "weapons of mass destruction concerns."
According to Asher, DARPA also felt concerned the research was "pure gain of function – which contradicts Fauci."
"It looks like the Chinese got into a global viral project, which works with this EcoHealth Alliance, and used China’s own funding to conduct the research into advancing the pathogenecity of COVID. Now we have all of the pieces genetically that account for Covid-19 being manufactured in that lab in Wuhan, the Wuhan institute by the bat lady (Dr. Shi Zhengli)," Asher said.
"All the lies that the Chinese had put out -- and all the lies and the cover-up at the NIH and others have been complicit in have now been defeated," he said, as the Bethesda, Maryland federal institute is the umbrella organization of Fauci's NIAID.
Asher called for a formal FBI investigation into the entire situation, calling it a likely "criminal cover-up."
"The fact that the U.S. Government has any relationship still to the Wuhan Institute is criminal in my mind," he said.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 5:26 pm
Capt Stapes still believe the CCP 1000%BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:59 pm At this point its a foregone conclusion that this virus was created in a lab.
China denies WHO access to bat caves in search for COVID origins
https://nypost.com/2021/10/11/china-den ... ns-report/
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 9:20 pm
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:11 pm
Time for the guillotine
BREAKING: Project Veritas releases military documents that contradict Fauci's sworn testimony on gain of function research
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, proceeded with the research at the Wuhan Virology Lab in China and at several sites other across the US.
Project Veritas released documents Monday night which appear to contradict NIH Director Dr. Anthony Fauci’s sworn testimony regarding gain of function research.
The documents come from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which were allegedly hidden in a top secret shared drive.
DARPA facilitates research in technology with potential military applications under the US Department of Defense
Project Veritas has obtained a report which stated that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, looking to obtain funding for Project Defuse to conduct gain of function research of coronaviruses from bats.
According to Project Veritas, the proposal was rejected by DARPA because it violated a gain of function research moratorium. Additionally, there were safety concerns.
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, proceeded with the research at the Wuhan Virology Lab in China and at several sites other across the US.
Fauci has repeated under oath during multiple Congressional hearings that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program.
According to Project Veritas, "The report goes on to detail concern regarding the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines."
DARPA’s Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, told Project Veritas when asked about the secrecy surrounding the documents, "It doesn’t sound normal to me. If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked. I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space."
According to Project Veritas, "The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now."
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:49 pm
Of course Fauci knows we have been experimenting with coronavirus and gain of function. He is using the Clinton defense and hiding behind some technicality with how the questions were asked. I thought that was obvious already.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:51 pm
So obvious that he still has the same or more power than he had one year ago.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:54 pm
Have you ever considered that his bosses don't care if he is lying? Fauci is obviously a "company man". You don't work through multiple administration's and not learn to carry the water. If Trump didn't fire him, nobody will.