Re: These wildfires
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:41 am
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
Same forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
Nonsense. Of course more water wouldve helped but per usual, the Democrats fucked that up too. Own this shithawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
You don't know shit about wildfire, water is never the solution and is only safe when applied from the air. You try to contain with planing and dug lines from hand lines to bulldozers. Wind ruins every plan, all you can do is predict direction.Biker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:11 pmNonsense. Of course more water wouldve helped but per usual, the Democrats fucked that up too. Own this shithawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
Truff.hawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:24 pmYou don't know shit about wildfire, water is never the solution and is only safe when applied from the air. You try to contain with planing and dug lines from hand lines to bulldozers. Wind ruins every plan, all you can do is predict direction.Biker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:11 pmNonsense. Of course more water wouldve helped but per usual, the Democrats fucked that up too. Own this shithawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
Trump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
That is really the truth. Everyone always wants to blame things, especially if they can spin it into some kind of political issue. The key is to learn from it and make improvements for next time.hawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
These are wilf, forest fires; theyre urban fires. Cant be digging ditches in cul de sacshawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:24 pmYou don't know shit about wildfire, water is never the solution and is only safe when applied from the air. You try to contain with planing and dug lines from hand lines to bulldozers. Wind ruins every plan, all you can do is predict direction.Biker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:11 pmNonsense. Of course more water wouldve helped but per usual, the Democrats fucked that up too. Own this shithawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
So you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
Aww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:07 pmSo you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
actually, I would think that raking the forest would work better than having more water on hand.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:22 pmAww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:07 pmSo you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
You go, girl! That's so cute!![]()
Of course raking and clearing out brush would help but Trump said it so of course Ricky and the Lefties have to say it's retarded to even suggest it. And before and anyone says it: no, I'm not saying doing those things would have prevented this.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 7:14 pmactually, I would think that raking the forest would work better than having more water on hand.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:22 pmAww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:07 pmSo you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
You go, girl! That's so cute!![]()
In case you missed it... Necro said it was retarded.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:17 pmOf course raking and clearing out brush would help but Trump said it so of course Ricky and the Lefties have to say it's retarded to even suggest it. And before and anyone says it: no, I'm not saying doing those things would have prevented this.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 7:14 pmactually, I would think that raking the forest would work better than having more water on hand.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:22 pmAww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:07 pmSo you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pm
Same forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
You go, girl! That's so cute!![]()
And as he said: You didn't understand.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:27 pmIn case you missed it... Necro said it was retarded.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:17 pmOf course raking and clearing out brush would help but Trump said it so of course Ricky and the Lefties have to say it's retarded to even suggest it. And before and anyone says it: no, I'm not saying doing those things would have prevented this.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 7:14 pmactually, I would think that raking the forest would work better than having more water on hand.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:22 pmAww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.
You go, girl! That's so cute!![]()
FTFYAnimal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:03 pm I think what pisses me off the most about Caliornia and their "wild fires" is the tremendous amount of Carbon Dioxide that they are releasing into the atmosphere. This is not green at all and they should not be allowed to do it. We should block federal funding until they find a cleaner way to burn their CITIES.
No. These are forest fires spread to urban areas by high winds. You dig lines in the forest areas to prevent them from spreading to urban areas. But you already knew that. You can't be so dumb you didn't understand that and be able to breathe.Biker wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 5:26 pmThese are wilf, forest fires; theyre urban fires. Cant be digging ditches in cul de sacshawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:24 pmYou don't know shit about wildfire, water is never the solution and is only safe when applied from the air. You try to contain with planing and dug lines from hand lines to bulldozers. Wind ruins every plan, all you can do is predict direction.Biker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:11 pmNonsense. Of course more water wouldve helped but per usual, the Democrats fucked that up too. Own this shithawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:58 pm I really don't think a bunch more water would have helped much in the big picture. The winds are just too much. Air attack and evacuation is about all they can do until the winds subside.
Preach it brotherAnimal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:03 pm I think what pisses me off the most about Caliornia and their "wild fires" is the tremendous amount of Carbon Dioxide that they are releasing into the atmosphere. This is not green at all and they should not be allowed to do it. We should block federal funding until they find a cleaner way to burn their forests.
So, no, you don't.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:22 pmAww... look at you trying to worm your way out of the self-own that you posted.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:07 pmSo you don't understand what I mean.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:00 pmTrump said it 4 years ago, dummy.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:52 pmSame forr leftists. I mean, look at this retarded statement:
You go, girl! That's so cute!![]()