UJRefugees.net

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

This logic is why the fourth box will be inevitable. And satisfying.

DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:04 pm

theclap wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:36 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:46 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:09 am Good thing justices can't be replaced this close to an election.

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

It should be filled ASAP. Preferably with a justice who can actually do the job, rather than falling asleep every five minutes or just not showing up for months at a time.
And the American people do have a voice in the selection of a new justice. They exercised it by electing President Trump.

Yup! Somehow a lot of people forget or just don't understand that millions of Americans voted for him.

And yet he was out-voted by over 3 million votes.

Doesn't mean squat in a democratic republic. If my aunt balls she'd be my uncle.

RIP

QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:19 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:59 pm Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

Are you trying to argue that the election of the US president, arguably the most important elected position in our current world, is little better than a tennis competition?

Not at all. If you ignore the rules it’s a different game. Kushner’s team ignored the experts and threaded the needle to get the right number of the right states.

The nation can’t help that coastal cities dominate Democrat politics. I thank God the founders recognized this and gave small states a fair say in presidential elections.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:22 pm

QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:19 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:59 pm Does that really make you feel good to say that? People lose Wimbledon by winning more points.

Are you trying to argue that the election of the US president, arguably the most important elected position in our current world, is little better than a tennis competition?

Not at all. If you ignore the rules it’s a different game. Kushner’s team ignored the experts and threaded the needle to get the right number of the right states.

The nation can’t help that coastal cities dominate Democrat politics. I thank God the founders recognized this and gave small states a fair say in presidential elections.

Much agreed. If the 3 million popular votes were devided by 50 would she have won the electoral? If San Francisco, LA and NYC decided the entire countries future, what a cluster that would be.

What would this country be if the anti-intellectual white trash vote didn't carry more weight.

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:47 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 am

You sure about that? If that's true, it's definitely NOT a good thing.

EDIT: I did some looking, and I can't find anything that says we can't install a new Conservative justice. This is me doing the happy dance, because we're going to put a stop to some of the regressive agenda.

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

This logic is why the fourth box will be inevitable. And satisfying.

Fourth box?

What does that mean?

Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 7:47 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:47 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

This logic is why the fourth box will be inevitable. And satisfying.

Fourth box?

What does that mean?

Repubs, dems, libertarian, and communist?

Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 7:47 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:47 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

This logic is why the fourth box will be inevitable. And satisfying.

Fourth box?

What does that mean?

Your mom's.

Geist wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:29 pm What would this country be if the anti-intellectual white trash vote didn't carry more weight.

Doomed.

Geist wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:29 pm What would this country be if the anti-intellectual white trash vote didn't carry more weight.

As if democrats weren't the "anti-intellectuals". You dumb motherfuckers cant tell the difference between boys and girls. A bunch of grown-ass adults who think saying you're a girl means you are a girl. When your side grows up and learns the difference between reality and make-believe, get back to me on the "anti-intellectual" thing.

Deathproof wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:12 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:29 pm What would this country be if the anti-intellectual white trash vote didn't carry more weight.

As if democrats weren't the "anti-intellectuals". You dumb motherfuckers cant tell the difference between boys and girls. A bunch of grown-ass adults who think saying you're a girl means you are a girl. When your side grows up and learns the difference between reality and make-believe, get back to me on the "anti-intellectual" thing.

Not my side, I hate democrats. They're spineless, get lost in diversionary identity politics, and won't let the gun issue go. Doesn't change the fact that your average republican is still dumber and prouder.

Geist wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:25 pm

Deathproof wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:12 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:29 pm What would this country be if the anti-intellectual white trash vote didn't carry more weight.

As if democrats weren't the "anti-intellectuals". You dumb motherfuckers cant tell the difference between boys and girls. A bunch of grown-ass adults who think saying you're a girl means you are a girl. When your side grows up and learns the difference between reality and make-believe, get back to me on the "anti-intellectual" thing.

Not my side, I hate democrats. They're spineless, get lost in diversionary identity politics, and won't let the gun issue go. Doesn't change the fact that your average republican is still dumber and prouder.

Prouder, yes. But thats because we're patriotic people who love our country.

But dumber? Than democrats, who riot over dead criminals? Definitely not.

Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 7:47 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:47 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 pm

WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:38 pm

Geist wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:42 am

The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.

The American people DID have a voice in the selection of their next SCJ. It's called Election Day Nov. 2016. Like Hussein mentioned at the time, "elections have consequences". It sure did.

I agree. Should have no issue getting Merrick Garland in.

Yeah, no reason to let logic get in your way. Hussein was a "lame-duck" President not even on the ballot that year. Let the voters decide first. Trump is running for a 2nd term. Only twice in 100 years has a sitting President failed to do that. And it's not happening against "Sleepy Joe".

This logic is why the fourth box will be inevitable. And satisfying.

Fourth box?

What does that mean?

The fourth theoretical box is ammo.

In other news, I have done some research and poking around, and I can unequivocally verify: the vile bitch is still dead.

I'm getting reports that her memoir will be posthumously published before Christmas, featuring her #MeToo confession about being groped by Abraham Lincoln.

ted cruz will be her replacement.

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:47 pm ted cruz will be her replacement.

I would pay just to watch the confirmation hearings. SNL could fire their writing staff.

Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:50 pm

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:47 pm ted cruz will be her replacement.

I would pay just to watch the confirmation hearings. SNL could fire their writing staff.

it seems logical given the facts but it will probably be Thomas Hardiman

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:12 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:50 pm

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:47 pm ted cruz will be her replacement.

I would pay just to watch the confirmation hearings. SNL could fire their writing staff.

it seems logical given the facts but it will probably be Thomas Hardiman

i haven't heard any news, but i thought someone told me that he (Trump) has said it would be a woman?

trump is a woman. id love to slap that fat fuck around

Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:18 pm

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:12 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:50 pm

porky wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:47 pm ted cruz will be her replacement.

I would pay just to watch the confirmation hearings. SNL could fire their writing staff.

it seems logical given the facts but it will probably be Thomas Hardiman

i haven't heard any news, but i thought someone told me that he (Trump) has said it would be a woman?

Its gonna be fun. Every time the dipshit liberals say a negative word about her, we get to scream "misogyny" like they did when people (rightfully) criticized Monica Lewinsky's ex-boyfriend's wife or Moochelle Obama.
Bonus fun to be had if it's a minority woman. Then we get to clutch pearls and scream "racism" too. Its about time we get to use their tactics against them.

Republicans would never put an African-American female up...... Their Trump base would not tolerate it........ They do have a Cuban in the wings though. The smart money was on the ultra conservative Lily white Catholic lady but I'll bet the evangelicals have been putting that to bed.