UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://www.ujrefugees.net/
50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said soCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 12:03 pmAt this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.
Stop acting like you understand any of the science.You’ve proven many times over you are no where near that intelligent. You’re just repeating talking points that you found on your favorite conservative news sources.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:44 pm50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said soCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 12:03 pmAt this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.
spudoc wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 6:35 pmStop acting like you understand any of the science.You’ve proven many times over you are no where near that intelligent. You’re just repeating talking points that you found on your favorite conservative news sources.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:44 pm50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said soCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 12:03 pmAt this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.
Great retort, faggotspudoc wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 6:35 pmStop acting like you understand any of the science.You’ve proven many times over you are no where near that intelligent. You’re just repeating talking points that you found on your favorite conservative news sources.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:44 pm50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said soCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 12:03 pmAt this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.
What evidence have you shown, cunty?Stapes wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:07 pmspudoc wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 6:35 pmStop acting like you understand any of the science.You’ve proven many times over you are no where near that intelligent. You’re just repeating talking points that you found on your favorite conservative news sources.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:44 pm50/50? I don’t see any evidence that it came about naturally. The only evidence we have if that is because China and Fauci said soCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 12:03 pmAt this point I believe its 50/50 either way. What I DO believe is that it did NOT come from some sleazy-ass wet market like the Chinese said it did. We should be smart enough by now to not believe anything the Chinese say.
Exactly... You could shove the evidence up his asshole and he would call it bob
This whole thing has been political since last April so it’s not a surprise that it still is. They simply cannot under any condition admit to say that big scarewee orange man was rightCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:20 pm We there is no guess work as to who two of the three 'not a leak' voters are.
Denial is such a nasty thing to watch though...
Not only that but also this: they would then be forced to acknowledge that their beloved unbiased media shouted down, ridiculed and/or ignored this possibility all because ORANGE MAN BAD! That would be basically an admission that their beloved "unbiased" and "legitimate" news sources pushed aside a huge story because they didnt want to give Trump any cover or credit.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:45 pmThis whole thing has been political since last April so it’s not a surprise that it still is. They simply cannot under any condition admit to say that big scarewee orange man was rightCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:20 pm We there is no guess work as to who two of the three 'not a leak' voters are.
Denial is such a nasty thing to watch though...
And moreover, Zuckerberg and Dorsey reached out to Fauci to get the official narrative in order to censor those who thought this was a possibility, even though Fauci knew it to be possible. It’s shit straight out of the CCP playbookCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:53 pmNot only that but also this: they would then be forced to acknowledge that their beloved unbiased media shouted down, ridiculed and/or ignored this possibility all because ORANGE MAN BAD! That would be basically an admission that their beloved "unbiased" and "legitimate" news sources pushed aside a huge story because they didnt want to give Trump any cover or credit.Biker wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:45 pmThis whole thing has been political since last April so it’s not a surprise that it still is. They simply cannot under any condition admit to say that big scarewee orange man was rightCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:20 pm We there is no guess work as to who two of the three 'not a leak' voters are.
Denial is such a nasty thing to watch though...
Falchi is a nobody? If you read them you'd see he sent some of them. All you have to read are the headers.
So youre sticking with the wet-market story China claims?
And I am laughing because this sounds just exactly like you retards clapping every time some lamestream came out with a survey to prove hydroxychloroquine didn't work. Those were good times.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:30 pm
anything is possible.... Im just laughing at you fools grabbing on to any nonsense so you can say your cult leader was right..... Except nothing you provide is evidence.... Just conjectures and theories from people with the own agendas.
The fact of the matter is without the consent of the chinese government to provide access to all their data no one will ever know 100 % but you think you see proof because you can't read or do your own rrsearch. You let biker spoonfeed garbage and clap like retarded children
Moron
Experts Explain ‘Damning’ Evidence That COVID-19 Was Deliberately Altered In A Lab
A scientist and a doctor explained in a Sunday op-ed the “damning” evidence suggesting that COVID-19 was altered in a laboratory.
Dr. Steven Quay and UC Berkeley emeritus professor of physics Richard Muller explained in The Wall Street Journal that the genomic structure of COVID-19 was unlike anything discovered in nature, which is the strongest evidence the coronavirus was altered in a lab.
The two explained that in gain-of-function research, a spike protein is altered for the purpose of making a virus more transmissible or lethal. A specific genomic sequence, CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG”), they said, has “never been found naturally” in “the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2.” They explained that natural processes could not create a sequence combination if it “isn’t present in any other virus.”
The two wrote:
Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it. An additional advantage of the double CGG sequence compared with the other 35 possible choices: It creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.
Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?
They noted that when Chinese scientists published a paper in February 2020, it omitted any mention of the sequence that scientists can identify when they examine the coronavirus.
They continued:
There is additional scientific evidence that points to CoV-2’s gain-of-function origin. The most compelling is the dramatic differences in the genetic diversity of CoV-2, compared with the coronaviruses responsible for SARS and MERS.
Both of those were confirmed to have a natural origin; the viruses evolved rapidly as they spread through the human population, until the most contagious forms dominated. Covid-19 didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version. No serious viral “improvement” took place until a minor variation occurred many months later in England.
Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research. Mice that are genetically modified to have the same coronavirus receptor as humans, called “humanized mice,” are repeatedly exposed to the virus to encourage adaptation.
