DandyDon wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 3:59 pm
I seem to remember us having a discussion about this very thing, and being assured by you that it didnt mean anything. Hmm, what was that about? Oh yeah, I remember...
Because escorting a guy out of a political rally is exactly the same as slaughtering 50 innocents?
GTFO
You know damn well I'm referring to the WP sign, and the administration she is attached to the hip of.
Charlotte Clymer wants to know where Common Sense has gone.
Charlotte Clymer. The tranny.
What does her sexual orientation have to do with common sense gun laws?
I'm saying that a man who wears a dress and walks around pretending to be a woman is not the best advocate for common sense.
You'd rather vote conservative which by definition is voting for an intellectual disability.
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:50 pm
by QillerDaemon
analhamster wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:42 amPersonally I'd impose a simple loyalty test for anyone wanting to settle here, put your hand on the holy book of choice and swear allegiance to the queen
And be sure to have the Home Office official mention that ol' Bessie has a (somewhat dubious) claim to an ancient descent from Mohammed during that test.
Charlotte Clymer wants to know where Common Sense has gone.
Charlotte Clymer. The tranny.
What does her sexual orientation have to do with common sense gun laws?
I'm saying that a man who wears a dress and walks around pretending to be a woman is not the best advocate for common sense.
A valid argument when made by a person of questionable intellectual integrity is no less valid than one made by a genius.
His/her sexual orientation is irrelevant.
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 7:10 pm
by WestTexasCrude
Everybody needs to go back and watch Trump's inauguration speech. After 16 years and 2 Presidents who timidly refused to breach the subject, worried about offending anybody, and all the shit, Trump mentions "Radical Islamic Terrorists" not once, not twice but 3 times. Doesn't care about the PC BS.
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 7:19 pm
by CaptQuint
I don't remember him mentioning white terrorists at all
captquint wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 7:19 pm
I don't remember him mentioning white terrorists at all
Whites can't be Radical Islamic Terrorists? I did not know that.
I'm not recalling any white Radical Islamic mass murders
isn't there some dude from great britain that went over there and started beheading people?
Maybe, I know a bunch of stupid kids went over to join ISIS, but if we need to reach this hard I think it proves my point. Trump did good saying Radical Islamic Terrorists, now I wanna hear him say White nationalist Terrorism and Russian Election Influence
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 10:33 pm
by VinceBordenIII
What is this White Nationalist Terrorism I'm hearing about? Is that a thing? I haven't heard anything about it.
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 10:36 pm
by CaptQuint
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 10:33 pm
What is this White Nationalist Terrorism I'm hearing about? Is that a thing? I haven't heard anything about it.
U.S. sees steady rise in violence by white supremacists
captquint wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:02 pm
What? That the far right is dangerous?
Derp Derp Derp
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:04 am
by WestTexasCrude
Derp derp. It's your ignorance of the main issues that make me believe that we need to reassess who is allowed to vote. There has to be an obvious solution to weed out retards like CQ. Suggestions?
Re: NZ Terror Attack
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:10 am
by WestTexasCrude
I got it. Landowners only. And stack on the slaves at 2/3 persons.
