Page 5 of 15
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:55 pm
by Charliesheen
That’s the conundrum. We all know the left is dying to hang this around Trump’s neck.
But to hang anything would imply that something actually exists. The crickets make total sense.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:03 pm
by Animal
Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:55 pm
That’s the conundrum. We all know the left is dying to hang this around Trump’s neck.
But to hang anything would imply that something actually exists. The crickets make total sense.
i think they think its a Tarp.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:04 pm
by Biker
Link to the email dump if you’re interested. Why he was in contact with Bill Gates early and often is bizarre
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/na ... d-response
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
by Stapes
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm
Sars came from an animal source
Mers came from an animal source
Both corona viruses.
It is still more plausible so did covid-19
But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?
Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".
Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
by Biker
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm
Sars came from an animal source
Mers came from an animal source
Both corona viruses.
It is still more plausible so did covid-19
But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?
Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".
Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
by Stapes
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
by Stapes
Biker wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:25 pm
Sars came from an animal source
Mers came from an animal source
Both corona viruses.
It is still more plausible so did covid-19
But yall already have it escaping a lab and locking fauci up without a shed of evidence yet.
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?
Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".
Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.
You're like the UJR Tucker Carlson, half truths, outright lies, propaganda, pure bull shit misinformation. No credibility
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:23 pm
by Animal
do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:24 pm
by Biker
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:22 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:19 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:12 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:49 pm
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:31 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 2:32 pm
actually, its those emails. you know, the "shreds of evidence" that lead people like me (at least) to think maybe this needs to be examined. I mean, don't you think its a big enough of a deal to look into?
Of course it should be investigated..... But some of these posts seem to already have come to a conclusion.
i am not coming to any conclusions. i am simply wondering why more people aren't "CONCERNED" that Dr Fauci got an email in March 2020 with a title of "Coronavirus Bio Weapon".
Does that seem odd? I mean, jesus christ, he was working for Trump at the time. You guys can blame Trump for the whole thing. Why is this not a big deal?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... -virus-wa/
Nice rigidity in the wording of the 'fact check'. The question proposed to him under oath asked whether or not there was early evidence that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The emails, as well as a SARS gain of function pdf clearly state otherwise. This is bigger than just him lying under oath to Congress.
You're like the UJR Tucker Carlson, half truths, outright lies, propaganda, pure bull shit misinformation. No credibility
I literally posted the emails, you ignorant fuck.
But seriously, is this the hill youre willing to die on, defending Fauci lies? Why are you so invested in that narrative now that Trump is gone? Its like you dont want to know the truth about how this started
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:26 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:28 pm
by Stapes
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:23 pm
do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.
You didn't read the article obviously. Basically there is no hard proof either way. What do you think public inquiry emails prove? There isn't any evidence given in these emails..... Just speculations..... Certainly no links to fauci or some biker cover uptin foil theory
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:34 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:43 pm
by Animal
Stapes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:28 pm
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:23 pm
do you realize what a lame attempt that is to flush all of these emails down the toilet? Some fact checker dug through them and determined that they do not PROVE that the virus was Manufactured? Did this fact checker dig through them and determine if the emails prove that the virus DID NOT COME FROM A LAB? If so, then you are on to something and post that. If not, then shut the fuck up with fact checks on nit picking non sense.
You didn't read the article obviously. Basically there is no hard proof either way. What do you think public inquiry emails prove? There isn't any evidence given in these emails..... Just speculations..... Certainly no links to fauci or some biker cover uptin foil theory
i think it proves that Dr Fauci got an email from someone in March of 2020 with a heading on it called "Coronavirus Bio Weapon". Now, instead of all the bullshit, what do you make of that? Is it interesting that he knew about a Covid Bio Weapon?
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 4:57 pm
by Biker
58% of Americans believe COVID-19 started in a Chinese lab, according to a poll taken during the month of May by YouGov. That’s up from just 49% when YouGov first asked the question in May 2020.
Only 43% of Democrats believe in the lab-leak theory, compared to 77% of Republicans. Independents lean more toward the GOP view, with 65% now believing the virus came from a lab.
Just 24% of Americans believe it was released from a lab on purpose, while 30% believe it was released by accident. Only 13% say the virus developed completely naturally in the wild, and one-third of respondents said they did not know the answer.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:01 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:01 pm
by Animal
well, if 58% of americans think it started in a lab, then that's almost 100%. Because there have to be at least 42% of americans that wouldn't even understand the question.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:33 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 9:48 pm
by spudoc
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:01 pm
well, if 58% of americans think it started in a lab, then that's almost 100%. Because there have to be at least 42% of americans that wouldn't even understand the question.
Texas does not make up 42% of the population.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:01 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:06 pm
by Biker
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by Cassandros
Biker wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:01 pm
This is interesting to me as I stumbled on this article just yesterday.
As COVID-19 collides with HIV/AIDS, the pandemic may be taking an ominous turn
As the world’s less affluent countries scramble for COVID-19 vaccine and contend with deadly surges of the disease, researchers in South Africa have just documented an ominous development: the collision of the pandemic with HIV/AIDS.
***
Still, the coronavirus that lingered in her body underwent 13 genetic changes related to its crucial spike protein, along with at least 19 other genetic shifts elsewhere that could change the behavior of the virus.
***
More than 30 genetic changes were detected in the patient's viral samples over the next 27 weeks, including a handful known to strengthen the virus’ ability to resist the vaccines and drugs that prevent or treat COVID-19.
Were they to begin circulating widely, they might have become the stuff of public health nightmares: “escape variants” capable of prolonging the pandemic.
It’s not yet clear whether any of the mutations she harbored spread to other people. But the researchers said it's probably not a coincidence that dangerous new variants have emerged from populations like those in South Africa's KwaZulu Natal province, where more than 1 in 4 adults has HIV.
https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-collide ... 51925.html
Hopefully she remains an outlier in these regards, and not a warning of whats to come.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:45 pm
by Antknot
Cassandros wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:33 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:01 pm
This is interesting to me as I stumbled on this article just yesterday.
As COVID-19 collides with HIV/AIDS, the pandemic may be taking an ominous turn
As the world’s less affluent countries scramble for COVID-19 vaccine and contend with deadly surges of the disease, researchers in South Africa have just documented an ominous development: the collision of the pandemic with HIV/AIDS.
***
Still, the coronavirus that lingered in her body underwent 13 genetic changes related to its crucial spike protein, along with at least 19 other genetic shifts elsewhere that could change the behavior of the virus.
***
More than 30 genetic changes were detected in the patient's viral samples over the next 27 weeks, including a handful known to strengthen the virus’ ability to resist the vaccines and drugs that prevent or treat COVID-19.
Were they to begin circulating widely, they might have become the stuff of public health nightmares: “escape variants” capable of prolonging the pandemic.
It’s not yet clear whether any of the mutations she harbored spread to other people. But the researchers said it's probably not a coincidence that dangerous new variants have emerged from populations like those in South Africa's KwaZulu Natal province, where more than 1 in 4 adults has HIV.
https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-collide ... 51925.html
Hopefully she remains an outlier in these regards, and not a warning of whats to come.
Since Covid I found in shit, those at risk for Analy Inserted Death Sentence seem to be at a higher risk.
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 3:04 pm
by Charliesheen
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 3:40 pm
by Biker
44% of those women had HIV. Damn
Re: So, was it a lab leak or nah?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 4:08 pm
by Biker
Fauci was told it was an engineered virus? That’s all I can think of