I'll take 'Cunts that need a smack' for $200, Alex

[BigChiefin]

[/quote]

He doesn't owe her an explanation. The people in the car were adults. They understood what it was about.
[/quote]

This is the correct answer.

[AnalHamster]

I think this difference in attitudes is symptomatic of your wider problems with the po-po. Y'all have to worry about getting swatted or shot dead in a traffic stop, whereas I can walk up to a british cop on the street and ask what he's up to, or just call him a cunt. I don't need to fear the police, I don't need to meekly call them sir and not talk back for fear of them going off on a power trip. They serve me, they call me sir.

edit - I would be meek and polite on a traffic stop though, since they'd have pulled me over for speeding and have me bang to rights and I'd want to get off with a verbal warning. I've only ever been pulled over once, on the motorway by an unmarked car, which I think is cheating. 92 in a 70 zone and they let me go, I was radiating meek subservience on that occasion.

[WestTexasCrude]

I have a question for you. Are you the actual FSchmertz from old UJ? Or just someone's troll account?

Nah, it's me. Who else would come up with that stupid nick?

Prove it. Where did the original FSchmertz get that nic from?

It was stolen from a character on the old TV show "I Love Lucy" called Fred Mertz, I just changed it a little.

Holy shit, it is you. Dude, so glad to see you found this place. You were always one of my favorite posters. I take it finding your old AV (hot babe in the tight black dress swinging the hips) is going to be impossible to find.

You mean that one?

Her name is Alizee, btw

Here's more https://giphy.com/explore/alizee

P.S. Better gif?

GD, there the AV is. FScmertz back in the flow. Still lives in NJ, though. Bummer.

[Animal]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

[BigChiefin]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

[HighNDry]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

Why does this holier than thou old cunt need to know anything? Fuck her.

[WestTexasCrude]

I think this difference in attitudes is symptomatic of your wider problems with the po-po. Y'all have to worry about getting swatted or shot dead in a traffic stop, whereas I can walk up to a british cop on the street and ask what he's up to, or just call him a cunt. I don't need to fear the police, I don't need to meekly call them sir and not talk back for fear of them going off on a power trip. They serve me, they call me sir.

edit - I would be meek and polite on a traffic stop though, since they'd have pulled me over for speeding and have me bang to rights and I'd want to get off with a verbal warning. I've only ever been pulled over once, on the motorway by an unmarked car, which I think is cheating. 92 in a 70 zone and they let me go, I was radiating meek subservience on that occasion.

I think you miss the point of the video- some snowflakes around here feel they are above it all and shouldn't be hassled with legal crap. Good to see the Mother Country still had civil discourses. Your "Child Country" is approaching 330 million and falling apart at the seams. Thus why you see Trump elected.

[Animal]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

Why does this holier than thou old cunt need to know anything? Fuck her.

well, i'm sure she knew the kids very well and knew there is no way that they could have done anything along the lines of having their car towed. And she knew that she could fix whatever the problem was. The cop was nice enough to ask the driver out of the car and sort of whisper the problem to him so as not to embarrass him in front of the other kids in the car. He didn't have to do that, but it was a nice gesture on his part. He could have shown the exact same courtesy to the mom when she arrived. Those cops have to understand that mothers don't stop being mothers when their kids hit 21. They still feel the need to fix whatever situation they find them in.

and he knew exactly what she was doing when she went to the tow truck driver. she wanted to know where he was taking it so she could start picking up the pieces when she figured out what was going on.

[VinceBordenIII]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

Yes. This wasn’t about wanting to know the reason for the stop. She was trying to intimidate the cops after her initial “what’s all this, then” authority tack failed. No reason to engage her whatsoever. Nothing to gain from it, everything to lose in some future court case.

[Geist]

She's against the wall.

Fucking tards.

[AnalHamster]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

Yes. This wasn’t about wanting to know the reason for the stop. She was trying to intimidate the cops after her initial “what’s all this, then” authority tack failed. No reason to engage her whatsoever. Nothing to gain from it, everything to lose in some future court case.

Because having a valid reason for the traffic stop is just devastating to a court case.

[necronomous]

Just gonna throw this out there, maybe its their policy? Its probably one they can break if they chose to, but probably shouldn't. She was a being a righteous indignant cunt. Sometimes I could have given a customer discounts or helped them out with info about their car, but chose not too because they were assholes. Yes AH, we could be nicer ALL the time, but not ALL the time does it call for it. Sometimes the cunts of the world deserve to be fired or forced to resign, and stop being allowed to treat anyone they want, however they want.

[PimpDaddy]

I think this difference in attitudes is symptomatic of your wider problems with the po-po. Y'all have to worry about getting swatted or shot dead in a traffic stop, whereas I can walk up to a british cop on the street and ask what he's up to, or just call him a cunt. I don't need to fear the police, I don't need to meekly call them sir and not talk back for fear of them going off on a power trip. They serve me, they call me sir.

edit - I would be meek and polite on a traffic stop though, since they'd have pulled me over for speeding and have me bang to rights and I'd want to get off with a verbal warning. I've only ever been pulled over once, on the motorway by an unmarked car, which I think is cheating. 92 in a 70 zone and they let me go, I was radiating meek subservience on that occasion.

Can you change your title to "radiating meek subservience" please? Anyone that asks our Police to bow down to cunts like this is in turn a cunt. A meek, subservient cunt.

[VinceBordenIII]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

Yes. This wasn’t about wanting to know the reason for the stop. She was trying to intimidate the cops after her initial “what’s all this, then” authority tack failed. No reason to engage her whatsoever. Nothing to gain from it, everything to lose in some future court case.

Because having a valid reason for the traffic stop is just devastating to a court case.

If they say the wrong thing and it’s recorded, the case can be thrown out, they can be accused of not following procedures, etc.
She had no right to know the particulars, and was trying to intimidate them. By not giving her satisfaction, they effectively exposed her for the cunt she is.

[Burn1dwn]

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred.

Exactly.

Most "rides" probably don't interact with the cops at all. I'm sure initially the cops were caught by surprise and then she set the tone with flashing her credentials.

She decided to get in a pissing contest with a cop. Stupid move. Especially if your are looking for some leeway.

[AnalHamster]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

Yes. This wasn’t about wanting to know the reason for the stop. She was trying to intimidate the cops after her initial “what’s all this, then” authority tack failed. No reason to engage her whatsoever. Nothing to gain from it, everything to lose in some future court case.

Because having a valid reason for the traffic stop is just devastating to a court case.

If they say the wrong thing and it’s recorded, the case can be thrown out, they can be accused of not following procedures, etc.
She had no right to know the particulars, and was trying to intimidate them. By not giving her satisfaction, they effectively exposed her for the cunt she is.

If they aren't following the rules then the case should get thrown out.

[PimpDaddy]

They followed the rules. The case didn't get thrown out. They didn't bow down to the cunt. And maybe that's one reason we can have savage things in this country like killy knives and Facebook - we don't bow down to every bit of bullshit thrown at us like 'some' countries.

[VinceBordenIII]

I kind of agree with AH. They could have just answered the question instead of throwing gas on the fire. they knew exactly what they were doing. Was she in the wrong? Yeah, but not until they acted the way they did.

I disagree. She approached with an attitude and could have asked her daughter or the driver the same question but wanted to put on a show for them. She is not a party to the infraction, so it is up to the driver to decide if he wants to tell her what occurred. I hope they foreclosed on her many homes after she lost her job. CUNT!

Yes. This wasn’t about wanting to know the reason for the stop. She was trying to intimidate the cops after her initial “what’s all this, then” authority tack failed. No reason to engage her whatsoever. Nothing to gain from it, everything to lose in some future court case.

Because having a valid reason for the traffic stop is just devastating to a court case.

If they say the wrong thing and it’s recorded, the case can be thrown out, they can be accused of not following procedures, etc.
She had no right to know the particulars, and was trying to intimidate them. By not giving her satisfaction, they effectively exposed her for the cunt she is.

If they aren't following the rules then the case should get thrown out.

If they followed the rules, but misspoke when answering this woman's "concerns," she could try to use it. "He said this: <xxx>"

Once again, she had NO RIGHT to any information. But what she wanted was not information, but to throw her weight around and intimidate the cops into backing down.

[Animal]

If they followed the rules, but misspoke when answering this woman's "concerns," she could try to use it. "He said this: <xxx>"

Once again, she had NO RIGHT to any information. But what she wanted was not information, but to throw her weight around and intimidate the cops into backing down.

in court? wtf? he was a college kid from out of town driving his mom's car (I think). There was no registration or insurance. This would have been a minor deal for a traffic lawyer to work out over a fax machine. you would have to be a moron to let a traffic ticket make its way to a court room.

[VinceBordenIII]

If they followed the rules, but misspoke when answering this woman's "concerns," she could try to use it. "He said this: <xxx>"

Once again, she had NO RIGHT to any information. But what she wanted was not information, but to throw her weight around and intimidate the cops into backing down.

in court? wtf? he was a college kid from out of town driving his mom's car (I think). There was no registration or insurance. This would have been a minor deal for a traffic lawyer to work out over a fax machine. you would have to be a moron to let a traffic ticket make its way to a court room.

I’m talking about her trying to make a thing out of it. Get the whole thing dropped because the cop said something inaccurate. Don’t forget, she’s the one who threatened to talk to the mayor and whoever else.

[Animal]

I’m talking about her trying to make a thing out of it. Get the whole thing dropped because the cop said something inaccurate. Don’t forget, she’s the one who threatened to talk to the mayor and whoever else.

how in the hell do you "drop" a car that isn't registered and doesn't have insurance? The car either has it or it doesn't. If it has it you provide the proof and if it doesn't you register and insure it and provide that? this isn't a reckless driving or speeding.

And as for her telling him she was going to talk to the mayor, i doubt it was about whether the car was insured. I would guess it was about a cop that wouldn't explain to her why her daughter's friend's car was being towed.

[VinceBordenIII]

I’m talking about her trying to make a thing out of it. Get the whole thing dropped because the cop said something inaccurate. Don’t forget, she’s the one who threatened to talk to the mayor and whoever else.

how in the hell do you "drop" a car that isn't registered and doesn't have insurance? The car either has it or it doesn't. If it has it you provide the proof and if it doesn't you register and insure it and provide that? this isn't a reckless driving or speeding.

And as for her telling him she was going to talk to the mayor, i doubt it was about whether the car was insured. I would guess it was about a cop that wouldn't explain to her why her daughter's friend's car was being towed.

Then why do you suppose she went after him over and over again about the specifics? Why were they pulled over? All she had to do was ask the driver. But she kept on after the cop.

[Animal]

Then why do you suppose she went after him over and over again about the specifics? Why were they pulled over? All she had to do was ask the driver. But she kept on after the cop.

because i think she wanted to know exactly what the problem was. to see if it was something she could fix rather than having to go through all of the bullshit of getting a car out of an impound lot on a holiday week-end. she probably knew all of the people (including the parents) involved and knew this would be easily fixed. But meanwhile she has to get them all back to their schools, get this car out of impound on monday or tuesday. then get the car back to the kid. That is a whole bunch of crap to go through.

[VinceBordenIII]

Then why do you suppose she went after him over and over again about the specifics? Why were they pulled over? All she had to do was ask the driver. But she kept on after the cop.

because i think she wanted to know exactly what the problem was. to see if it was something she could fix rather than having to go through all of the bullshit of getting a car out of an impound lot on a holiday week-end. she probably knew all of the people (including the parents) involved and knew this would be easily fixed. But meanwhile she has to get them all back to their schools, get this car out of impound on monday or tuesday. then get the car back to the kid. That is a whole bunch of crap to go through.

Maybe. But she IS an elitist cunt.

[Animal]

Then why do you suppose she went after him over and over again about the specifics? Why were they pulled over? All she had to do was ask the driver. But she kept on after the cop.

because i think she wanted to know exactly what the problem was. to see if it was something she could fix rather than having to go through all of the bullshit of getting a car out of an impound lot on a holiday week-end. she probably knew all of the people (including the parents) involved and knew this would be easily fixed. But meanwhile she has to get them all back to their schools, get this car out of impound on monday or tuesday. then get the car back to the kid. That is a whole bunch of crap to go through.

Maybe. But she IS an elitist cunt.

i was at a funeral many years ago. an old woman had died. anyway, i was driving her husband about 100 miles to where she would be buried (after the funeral). She was buried in a really small town in another state. on the way we talked and one thing he said was that his wife had only asked him for one thing when she was buried. she didn't want to be on the "end" of the burial plots. she wanted to be between him (her husband when he dies) and his father (who was already dead. She didn't want to be buried with a "stranger" on one side. He had 2 grave sites left. One that he had bought many years ago and one that an aunt had willed to him.

So, we get there and sure enough, they had dug the hole on the "outside" grave. The one that he owned. He had told them to dig it in the one willed to him that was by his dad. They said they had no proof that he owned it, therefore couldn't use the other grave site. Meanwhile, 40 people are waiting for the service and the casket is sitting in a sling over the wrong grave. The city owned the grave yard, so we were talking to a city employee on a Saturday grave service. I pulled her aside, told him I would handle it, and to go on with the service.

When I got her alone, away from the crowd, I said, "look, i know he owns that other grave. You probably believe him, but your hands are tied. I get it. He can't correct this with a copy of the will until Monday. Now, how much does it cost to dig a hole and cover up the other one?" She said about $200. I said, "Okay" I pulled out $500. I said, "Now, I am going to give you this to hold until Monday. When the crowd leaves, have the crew dig a new hole in the right place. On Monday, if he can prove everything at the city you can give him back $300 of this and keep the other $200 for having to dig 2 holes". She, after a few phone calls, reluctantly agreed and it all worked out perfectly. They even gave him back all the $500 on Monday. I wasn't being elitist. I was just trying to fix a problem.