It's true, all I know are the facts in the established record. Care to finally share your conspiracy truther sources?Biker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:05 amWe do need to give Hammy a break. He doesn’t know anything about the case other than what he’s Googled and Wikied. He deserves at least an A for participationWestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:02 amRight. Like the one thing missing from the Sandusky case. Weird.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:54 amanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 amThere is literally video of Nasser molesting little girls taken from his own computer porn stash, you fucking moron.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:38 am Still doesn't answer the one question that sticks out like a high powered light in the darkness. In all of my examples, from Cosby to Nassar, to Weinstien, etc. all of this raping, sexual abuse, abuse of power over years/decades. Hundreds and hundreds of "victims". and yet not one single example of anyone even taking the simple step of going by their local police station and filing a criminal complaint. Not a fucking one. That speaks volumes along with the flurry of lawsuits involving millions. BS.
Huh, child molester with a porn stash. Weird
Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Moderator: Animal
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
A talk show host, yeah that's kinda unsurprising 

- Burn1dwn
- Non-Gay Omar
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
I think showering with minors without at least parental approval should be illegal on its own. Invading personal space while "teaching hygiene" definitely sounds like it should be discouraged. Apparently its not in PA.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Yeah, he also did one on a 9/11 film that he claims the clintons blocked from wide release and one about how a media conspiracy got obama elected, fucking dupe

I wouldn't be at all surprised if you weren't taken in by those though, conspiracy dupes tend to be strangely selective. That's why WTC stands out for blanket exoneration all sex pests rather than just the one that it makes you feel smart and special to recognise as really a great guy you'd leave your kids with.
- FreakShowFanatic
- 12 Monkeys and More!
- Posts: 6001
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:17 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Once again, Biker looks like a fucking idiot. 

Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Anyone one you want to nominate your kids for in particular? I would suggest the latest fashion- Biggest bank account= deepest pockets. And don't forget kids- not a word to the local police. Your local sympathetic courts will sway with the media hype.analhamster wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:28 amYeah, he also did one on a 9/11 film that he claims the clintons blocked from wide release and one about how a media conspiracy got obama elected, fucking dupe
I wouldn't be at all surprised if you weren't taken in by those though, conspiracy dupes tend to be strangely selective. That's why WTC stands out for blanket exoneration all sex pests rather than just the one that it makes you feel smart and special to recognise as really a great guy you'd leave your kids with.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Try reading it again when you're sober I guess.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:38 amAnyone one you want to nominate your kids for in particular? I would suggest the latest fashion- Biggest bank account= deepest pockets. And don't forget kids- not a word to the local police. Your local sympathetic courts will sway with the media hype.analhamster wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:28 amYeah, he also did one on a 9/11 film that he claims the clintons blocked from wide release and one about how a media conspiracy got obama elected, fucking dupe
I wouldn't be at all surprised if you weren't taken in by those though, conspiracy dupes tend to be strangely selective. That's why WTC stands out for blanket exoneration all sex pests rather than just the one that it makes you feel smart and special to recognise as really a great guy you'd leave your kids with.
- necronomous
- The Super Cool Contrarian
- Posts: 8370
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Fuck it. Jared is innocent. Prove me wrong.
- JackRabbit_Slim
- Have Sister, Will Bang
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:29 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Ask asshamster... he's the resident expert.
"you have a fine boy there..." CaptGotti
- JackRabbit_Slim
- Have Sister, Will Bang
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:29 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
"The state Supreme Court ruled it will not take up Graham Spanier's appeal of the misdemeanor conviction related to Spanier's handling of a 2001 complaint about Sandusky showering with a boy in the football team locker room."
"No one is above the law, and my office will continue to pursue anyone who looks the other way in the face of child sexual abuse," Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement. "There are consequences for failing to protect children in Pennsylvania."
Spanier's lawyers have said that for the relevant provision of the state's statute of limitations to apply, prosecutors would have needed to prove the boy in the shower in 2001 was less than 14 years and 11 days old. Referred to as "Victim 2" in court records and testimony, the boy's identity has been disputed, with prosecutors saying they are not sure who he is.
Didn't this whole thing hinge on victim 2? And prosecution doesn't even know who that is!? Wtf
https://www.wtae.com/article/former-pen ... d/26452919
"No one is above the law, and my office will continue to pursue anyone who looks the other way in the face of child sexual abuse," Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement. "There are consequences for failing to protect children in Pennsylvania."
Spanier's lawyers have said that for the relevant provision of the state's statute of limitations to apply, prosecutors would have needed to prove the boy in the shower in 2001 was less than 14 years and 11 days old. Referred to as "Victim 2" in court records and testimony, the boy's identity has been disputed, with prosecutors saying they are not sure who he is.
Didn't this whole thing hinge on victim 2? And prosecution doesn't even know who that is!? Wtf
https://www.wtae.com/article/former-pen ... d/26452919
"you have a fine boy there..." CaptGotti
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5867
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
- JackRabbit_Slim
- Have Sister, Will Bang
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:29 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
That's victim 5. Victim 2 is the supposed shower victim that started it all..
"you have a fine boy there..." CaptGotti
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5867
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Your post says he was convicted of failing to protect a never identified victim and the post above says he was convicted of failing to protect that identified victim.JackRabbit_Slim wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:00 amThat's victim 5. Victim 2 is the supposed shower victim that started it all..
wut?
- JackRabbit_Slim
- Have Sister, Will Bang
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:29 pm
Re: Happy Valley, Happy Hoax?
Ugh...
Okay.. the reasoning is that because he allegedly failed to protect victim 2, he's culpable for all other victims.
Okay.. the reasoning is that because he allegedly failed to protect victim 2, he's culpable for all other victims.
"you have a fine boy there..." CaptGotti